38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Holds Nageswara Rao Guilty Of Contempt, Imposes Sentence

By LawStreet News Network      12 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
SC Holds Nageswara Rao Guilty Of Contempt, Imposes Sentence

The Supreme Court today (February 12, 2019) held CBI Additional Director M. Nageswara Rao guilty of contempt of court for transferring the investigating officer heading the probe in Muzaffarpur shelter home case in violation of the orders of the Court.

A Bench headed by CJI Ranjan Gogoi rejected Raos unconditional apology and sentenced him till the rising of the Court and imposed a fine of Rs 1 lakh.

The Bench also found guilty S. Bhasu Ram, in-charge Director of Prosecution CBI, who offered legal advice regarding the transfer orders and was awarded the same punishment as given to Rao.

Attorney General K.K. Venugopal, appearing for Rao, pleaded for leniency saying that Rao's mistake was not willful. However, CJI said that Rao's action was 'brazen contempt' and that he deserved no leniency.

CJI demanded to know why the court's prior permission was not sought for this. "Would the heavens have fallen if the relieving orders were passed after taking the SC into confidence, CJI asked the AG.

"I have not invoked contempt powers and punished anyone in the last 20 years. But this is brazen, CJI said.

A day before, Rao had filed an affidavit in the apex court offering unconditional and unqualified apology stating that "I sincerely realise my mistake and while tendering my unqualified and unconditional apology, I specially state I have not wilfully violated the order of this court as I cannot even dream of violating or circumventing order of this court. However, the court rejected his apology and found him guilty of contempt of court.

Earlier, on February 7, 2019, the Bench came down heavily on CBI for transferring its former Joint Director A.K. Sharma, who was probing Bihar's shelter home cases, out of the agency in violation of the court's order that the investigation team should not be changed. The Bench directed its then interim chief M. Nageswara Rao to personally appear before it on February 12, 2019.

Taking note of the grave violation of two earlier orders of the apex court, the Bench issued contempt notice to Rao for transferring Sharma to the CRPF on January 17 without taking prior permission from the court.

More than 40 minor girls were allegedly sexually abused at an NGO-run shelter home in Muzaffarpur, the issue had come to light following a report by the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS).



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

instigation-for-suicide-need-not-be-compulsive-suggestive-words-enough-to-attract-section-306-ipc
Trending Judiciary
Instigation for Suicide Need Not Be Compulsive; Suggestive Words Enough to Attract Section 306 IPC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that instigation for suicide under Section 306 IPC need not be forceful; even suggestive words implying the consequence can attract liability.

05 November, 2025 04:10 PM
public-ground-cannot-be-reserved-for-any-religion-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Public Ground Cannot Be Reserved For Any Religion: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras HC rules public grounds cannot be reserved for any religion, allowing Annadhanam on village land and holding that law-and-order fears can’t curb fundamental rights.

05 November, 2025 05:10 PM

TOP STORIES

hit-and-run-accident-case-sc-transfers-trial-involving-judicial-officer-from-punjab-to-delhi
Trending Judiciary
Hit-and-run accident case: SC transfers trial involving judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi

SC shifts hit-and-run case involving probationer judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi over alleged bias; orders potential further probe by Delhi Police.

31 October, 2025 11:27 AM
sc-issues-stern-warning-to-state-bar-councils-over-excessive-enrolment-fees-threatens-contempt-action
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Stern Warning To State Bar Councils Over Excessive Enrolment Fees, Threatens Contempt Action [Read Order]

SC warns State Bar Councils to stop charging over ₹750 enrollment fee or face contempt; directs BCI to issue circular, return applicants’ documents immediately.

31 October, 2025 11:32 AM
lawyers-cant-be-summoned-for-legal-advice-unless-covered-under-exceptions-of-sec-132-bsa-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers can't be summoned for legal advice unless covered under exceptions of Sec 132 BSA: SC

Supreme Court rules lawyers cannot be summoned for legal advice unless exceptions under Sec 132 BSA apply, safeguarding lawyer-client privilege and legal profession autonomy.

31 October, 2025 02:29 PM
conviction-us-138-ni-act-cannot-be-ground-to-stop-pension-madras-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Conviction U/S 138 NI Act Cannot Be Ground To Stop Pension: Madras High Court [Read Order]

Madras HC rules conviction under Section 138 NI Act is not moral turpitude and cannot justify stopping pension of retired employee; directs release of dues.

01 November, 2025 04:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email