38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 25, 2024
Breaking News
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC To Hear Petition Filed By Farmers Alleging Illegal Land Acquisitions In The Mumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet Train Project

By LawStreet News Network      17 January, 2020 04:01 PM      0 Comments
SC To Hear Petition Filed By Farmers Alleging Illegal Land Acquisitions In The Mumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet Train Project

The Supreme Court agreed today (January 17, 2020) to hear petitions filed by farmers to halt land acquisitions for India's first Bullet Train rail project to be set up between Mumbai-Ahmedabad which will run at a speed of 320-350 kmph. The Court will hear the matter on March 20, 2020. The decision of the court might delay the 508 kms long project. After rejection of the petition filed in the Gujarat High Court which had refused to declare land acquisitions as illegal as alleged by farmers, they moved the Apex Court.

A Division Bench headed by Justice Deepak Gupta of the Supreme Court is hearing the matter.

On September 18, 2018, around 1000 farmers had submitted affidavits in the Gujarat High Court opposing the proposed Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train project.

A division bench of Chief Justice R Subhash Reddy and Justice V M Pancholi is heard five petitions challenging the land acquisition process for the high-speed train rail project.

Besides these petitioners, 1000 farmers submitted separate affidavits in the Gujarat High Court to highlight the plight of many more cultivators that were affected by the Centre's ambitious Rs. 1.10 lac crores bullet train project.

In the affidavit, the affected farmers from various districts of Gujarat, from where the bullet train route would pass, had stated that they did not want acquisition of their land for the project.

Pointing out to the existing land acquisition proceedings, the farmers said that it was contrary to the guidelines of the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) that had provided a soft loan to the Indian government for the $17 billion project.

Further, the farmers alleged that the Gujarat government diluted the Land Acquisition Act 2013 after Japan entered into a contract with India for the bullet train in September 2015.

They told the court that the government didnt take their consent nor consulted them before initiating the land acquisition. Moreover, the social impact assessment for rehabilitation and resettlement was never discussed by the government.

The bullet train project was launched in September 2017 by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe.

For the project, around 1,400 hectares of land was supposed to be acquired in Gujarat and Maharashtra; 1,120 hectares of which is privately owned. Around 6,000 land owners would have to be compensated.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cheque-issued-for-bribe-payment-not-enforceable-under-ni-act-punjab-and-haryana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque issued for bribe payment not enforceable under NI Act: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that bribe payments do not constitute legally enforceable liabilities under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 October, 2024 10:56 AM
pune-porsche-accident-bombay-hc-rejects-anticipatory-bail-over-alleged-evidence-tampering-involving-3-lakh-bribe
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Accident: Bombay HC rejects anticipatory bail over alleged evidence tampering involving ₹3 lakh bribe [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rejects anticipatory bail in Pune Porsche accident case, citing serious evidence tampering and bribery allegations against the accused’s father.

24 October, 2024 11:07 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-plea-for-direction-to-set-up-regulatory-board-to-monitor-and-manage-ott-platforms
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for direction to set up regulatory board to monitor & manage OTT platforms

SC dismisses plea to set up a regulatory board for OTT platforms, stating the issue falls under policy matters, not for the court to intervene.

19 October, 2024 06:22 PM
a-judges-praise-of-politician-may-affect-publics-trust-in-judiciary-sc-judge-b-r-gavai
Trending Judiciary
A judge's praise of politician may affect public's trust in judiciary: SC judge B R Gavai

SC Judge B R Gavai cautions that judges praising politicians and resigning to contest elections may erode public trust and compromise judicial impartiality.

21 October, 2024 01:34 PM
complainant-cant-insist-on-deciding-plea-to-summon-other-accused-before-cross-examination-sc
Trending Judiciary
Complainant can't insist on deciding plea to summon other accused before cross examination: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules complainant can’t delay cross-examination to summon others as accused; trial court has discretion on timing under Section 319 CrPC.

21 October, 2024 01:36 PM
sc-dismisses-kejriwals-plea-against-summons-in-defamation-case-on-remarks-on-pms-academic-degree
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Kejriwal's plea against summons in defamation case on remarks on PM's academic degree

SC dismisses Kejriwal’s plea challenging summons in defamation case over remarks on PM Modi’s degree, upholding Gujarat University’s complaint.

21 October, 2024 05:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email