38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, March 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC To Hear Petition Filed By Farmers Alleging Illegal Land Acquisitions In The Mumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet Train Project

By LawStreet News Network      17 January, 2020 04:01 PM      0 Comments
SC To Hear Petition Filed By Farmers Alleging Illegal Land Acquisitions In The Mumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet Train Project

The Supreme Court agreed today (January 17, 2020) to hear petitions filed by farmers to halt land acquisitions for India's first Bullet Train rail project to be set up between Mumbai-Ahmedabad which will run at a speed of 320-350 kmph. The Court will hear the matter on March 20, 2020. The decision of the court might delay the 508 kms long project. After rejection of the petition filed in the Gujarat High Court which had refused to declare land acquisitions as illegal as alleged by farmers, they moved the Apex Court.

A Division Bench headed by Justice Deepak Gupta of the Supreme Court is hearing the matter.

On September 18, 2018, around 1000 farmers had submitted affidavits in the Gujarat High Court opposing the proposed Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train project.

A division bench of Chief Justice R Subhash Reddy and Justice V M Pancholi is heard five petitions challenging the land acquisition process for the high-speed train rail project.

Besides these petitioners, 1000 farmers submitted separate affidavits in the Gujarat High Court to highlight the plight of many more cultivators that were affected by the Centre's ambitious Rs. 1.10 lac crores bullet train project.

In the affidavit, the affected farmers from various districts of Gujarat, from where the bullet train route would pass, had stated that they did not want acquisition of their land for the project.

Pointing out to the existing land acquisition proceedings, the farmers said that it was contrary to the guidelines of the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) that had provided a soft loan to the Indian government for the $17 billion project.

Further, the farmers alleged that the Gujarat government diluted the Land Acquisition Act 2013 after Japan entered into a contract with India for the bullet train in September 2015.

They told the court that the government didnt take their consent nor consulted them before initiating the land acquisition. Moreover, the social impact assessment for rehabilitation and resettlement was never discussed by the government.

The bullet train project was launched in September 2017 by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe.

For the project, around 1,400 hectares of land was supposed to be acquired in Gujarat and Maharashtra; 1,120 hectares of which is privately owned. Around 6,000 land owners would have to be compensated.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-sets-aside-ngt-order-for-temple-demolition-holds-tribunal-has-no-jurisdiction-over-encroachments-under-municipal-laws
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside NGT Order for Temple Demolition; Holds Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction Over Encroachments Under Municipal Laws [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside NGT order to demolish Ghaziabad temple, ruling tribunal lacks jurisdiction over encroachments under municipal laws.

18 March, 2026 10:41 AM
meghalaya-hc-quashes-ghadc-order-making-st-certificate-mandatory-for-election-nominations
Trending Judiciary
Meghalaya HC Quashes GHADC Order Making ST Certificate Mandatory for Election Nominations [Read Order]

Meghalaya HC quashes GHADC notification mandating ST certificate for poll nominations, cites lack of Governor approval and due process.

18 March, 2026 03:51 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM
sc-pulls-up-railways-over-safety-measures-seeks-detailed-affidavit-on-fund-allocation-and-travel-insurance-disparity
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up Railways Over Safety Measures, Seeks Detailed Affidavit on Fund Allocation and Travel Insurance Disparity [Read Order]

Supreme Court pulls up Railways over slow safety progress, seeks detailed affidavit on fund allocation and says counter ticket passengers cannot be denied travel insurance.

13 March, 2026 02:04 PM
madras-hc-acquits-woman-in-husbands-murder-case-says-section-106-evidence-act-cannot-replace-prosecutions-burden-of-proof
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Acquits Woman in Husband’s Murder Case; Says Section 106 Evidence Act Cannot Replace Prosecution’s Burden of Proof [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court acquits woman in husband’s murder case, holding Section 106 of the Evidence Act cannot substitute the prosecution’s primary burden of proof.

13 March, 2026 02:11 PM
allahabad-hc-lists-waseem-rizvis-pil-challenging-functioning-and-composition-of-up-sunni-central-waqf-board-after-four-weeks
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL Challenging Functioning and Composition of UP Sunni Central Waqf Board After Four Weeks [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court lists Waseem Rizvi’s PIL challenging the functioning and composition of the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board; Court seeks further hearing on key contention.

14 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email