38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, December 20, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Issues Notice to Centre on Plea Against Provisions of Surrogacy, ART Acts

By LawStreet News Network      26 September, 2022 07:13 PM      0 Comments
SC Issues Notice to Centre on Plea Against Provisions of Surrogacy, ART Acts

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union government on a PIL challenging the vires of Surrogacy Act, 2021 and the Assisted Reproductive Technology Act, 2021 for direct infringement of reproductive rights of women.

A bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and Justice C T Ravikumar sought response from the Ministries of Health and Family Welfare, and of Women and Child Development and the Indian Council for Medical Research.

The petition was filed by a Chennai resident, Arun Muthuvel and argued by advocate Mohini Priya.

The petitioner is an IVF specialist practising at Chennai and currently the Managing Director of Iswarya Fertility Services Private Limited which runs fertility centres across the country.

The plea contended an unreasonable blanket ban on commercial surrogacy while allowing only altruistic surrogacy which may lead to further exploitation of women within the family which is akin to forced labour and unregulated markets for surrogacy.

It also claimed there was discriminatory and restrictive classification of persons under the scheme of the Acts making it violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

The plea also contended that there has been direct infringement of reproductive rights of women which is integral to right to privacy guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.

There have been ambiguities within the Acts as regards age thresholds, unreasonable mandates raising the cost of surrogacy and lack of transitory provisions.

"The Acts fall short in fully addressing the essential goal of regulating surrogacy and other assisted reproductive techniques. In turn, the two statutes impose restrictive regime which gravely impinges upon the most basic reproductive right of individuals. The two statutes, in fact, fail to imagine the various social and economic complexities of infertility and assisted reproduction leave alone address the satisfactorily," it contended.

Among others, the petitioner sought a direction or order recognising rights of women other than married women above 35 years of age to avail surrogacy as a means of assisted reproductive technique to experience motherhood.

Further, he sought a direction or order to strike down the definition of couple under S. 2(1)(h) of the Surrogacy Act, 2021 and of commissioning couple in S. 2(1)(e) of the ART Act, 2021 and  alternative read down the said definitions to include couples other the married man and woman.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

fight-4-justice-awards-2025-live4freedom-and-dhcba-to-honour-landmark-legal-struggles
Trending Events & Opportunity
Fight 4 Justice Awards 2025: Live4Freedom and DHCBA to Honour Landmark Legal Struggles

Fight 4 Justice Awards 2025 on Dec 20: Justice N. Kotiswar Singh as Chief Guest; Live4Freedom and DHCBA honour landmark legal struggles.

20 December, 2025 04:30 PM

TOP STORIES

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM
cash-debt-exceeding-20000-does-not-invalidate-cheque-dishonour-cases-under-section-138-of-the-ni-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Cash Debt Exceeding ₹20,000 Does Not Invalidate Cheque Dishonour Cases Under Section 138 of the NI Act: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that cash loans above ₹20,000 do not invalidate cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the NI Act despite I-T Act violations.

14 December, 2025 02:23 AM
sc-upholds-10-year-sentence-for-woman-in-commercial-quantity-ganja-case-rejects-pleas-based-on-sampling-irregularities
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds 10-Year Sentence for Woman in Commercial Quantity Ganja Case, Rejects Pleas Based on Sampling Irregularities [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds 10-year sentence under NDPS Act in commercial ganja case, ruling that sampling irregularities alone do not vitiate prosecution.

14 December, 2025 02:30 AM
sc-upholds-bail-in-2010-jnaneswari-express-derailment-case-issues-directions-on-speedy-trials-under-uapa
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Bail in 2010 Jnaneswari Express Derailment Case, Issues Directions on Speedy Trials Under UAPA [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds bail in the 2010 Jnaneswari Express derailment case while issuing sweeping directions to ensure speedy trials in UAPA cases.

14 December, 2025 02:39 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email