38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, January 23, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC judges differ on burial of Christian pastor in Chhattisgarh village graveyard

By Jhanak Sharma      28 January, 2025 12:56 PM      0 Comments
SC judges differ on burial of Christian pastor in Chhattisgarh village graveyard

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday gave a split verdict in a matter related to burial of a Christian pastor in a village graveyard as the Gram Panchayat and the state government declined it in view of opposition by Hindu tribunals.

SC’s Split Decision on Burial Rights Sparks Debate on Secularism and Public Order

The court directed for burial of the Pastor's body, kept in a morgue since January 7, in the place earmarked for his community 20-km away from his village.

A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma gave divergent views on a plea by Ramesh Baghel, the son of the deceased, to allow him to bury the body in his village graveyard.

Christian Pastor’s Burial Row: Supreme Court Directs Alternate Graveyard Amid Opposition

In her judgment, Justice Nagarathna felt denial of burial was against the sublime principle of secularism. The action has led to social ostracisation of the petitioner, Ramesh Baghel and his family.

She said the stand taken against burial of converted Christian was unfortunate and violated Articles 14 and 21 and provisions of non discrimination on the ground of religion in the Constitution.

On the opposite, Justice Sharma held that there is no reason as to why there should be an unqualified right to burial. "Sweeping and illusionary right can lead to public order disruption. Maintenance of public order is in larger interest of society," he said.

Justice Sharma pointed out the designated burial ground is present just 20 kms away in village Karakwal.

He said, to claim Article 25 rights which stretches to other burial areas of another faith would be stretching the right which is subject to public order. The State can frame regulations and thus no absolute and unqualified right can be claimed in this regard, he said.

Justice Nagarathna pointed out in the Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay judgment, this court said, Bharat is a secular nation committed to securing fundamental rights to all. She felt the concept of tolerance should not be diluted.

Following the split judgment, the bench, however, said it does not wish to refer the matter to larger bench, as the body is in morgue since January 7.

The court directed for burial to take place in burial ground of Karakwal.

Petitioner Ramesh Baghel challenged the order by the Chhattisgarh High Court, which said there were no separate burial grounds for Christians in the village and declined a permission for burial, observing it could cause unrest and disharmony in the public at large.

The petitioner claimed Chhindawada village had a graveyard which was verbally allotted by the gram panchayat for burial and cremation of bodies.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

accused-need-not-appear-on-every-date-after-bail-in-appeals-sc
Trending Judiciary
Accused Need Not Appear on Every Date After Bail in Appeals: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules accused on bail after suspension of sentence need not appear on every hearing date in appellate or revisional courts.

19 January, 2026 12:47 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-press-councils-rejection-of-editors-guilds-claim-in-15th-press-council-constitution
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Press Council’s Rejection of Editors Guild’s Claim in 15th Press Council Constitution [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upheld Press Council of India’s rejection of Editors Guild’s claim, citing delay and non-compliance, and declined to interfere in 15th Press Council constitution.

19 January, 2026 01:39 PM
kerala-hc-full-bench-holds-hindu-wife-entitled-to-maintenance-from-husbands-immovable-property
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Full Bench Holds Hindu Wife Entitled to Maintenance from Husband’s Immovable Property [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a Hindu wife can claim maintenance from her husband’s immovable property, laying down a three-stage framework of rights.

19 January, 2026 02:00 PM
from-constitutional-promise-to-enforceable-right-how-the-supreme-court-gave-teeth-to-article-21a-and-the-rte-acts-25-quota
Trending Judiciary
From Constitutional Promise to Enforceable Right: How the Supreme Court Gave Teeth to Article 21A and the RTE Act’s 25% Quota [Read Order]

Supreme Court enforces Article 21A, mandates statutory rules for RTE Act’s 25% quota, and empowers NCPCR to monitor State compliance.

19 January, 2026 02:43 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email