38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC lays down guidelines against arbitrary bulldozer actions [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      14 November, 2024 01:49 PM      0 Comments
SC lays down guidelines against arbitrary bulldozer actions

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday said resorting to bulldozer action by the state authorities to demolish house and shop of a person accused of an offence is totally unconstitutional, violative of the fundamental and statutory rights of the citizens.

A bench of Justices B R Gavai and K V Vishwanathan held the Executive can't take upon themselves the task assigned to the judiciary.

"The executive cannot become a judge and decide that a person is guilty and therefore punish him by demolishing their house," the court said, declaring such actions would dealt with heavy hand.

The court held that the residential or commercial property of an accused or convict of a crime can't be demolished without following the due process of law as the right to shelter is one of the facet of fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution.

In detailed guidelines against such arbitrary and highhanded actions by the state authorities, the court said such actions by the state officers would be violative of the fundamental principle of separation of power wherein the judiciary is entrusted to adjudicate upon such issues.

The court said life, liberty and property of the citizens can't be taken away arbitrarily and it is the State's responsibility to maintain law and order and protect the citizens.

The bench underscored the principles of presumption of innocence of the accused until held guilty, to asset that even the convict is granted protection under the law against any arbitrary action.

Also Read: Bahraich violence: UP govt assures SC not to take bulldozer action against accused till Wednesday

Such punishment can't be enforced without following the due process, it said.

"It is not a happy sight to see women, children and aged people rendered homeless in such fashion," the bench said.

It said the officers of the State can't take upon themselves functions to be performed by the judiciary and act in violation of fundamental and statutory rights of the citizens.

It would be "totally unconstitutional", if the executive started declaring a person as guilty.

There may be unauthorised constructions which may be compoundable in such cases, the bench said.

The court said before carrying out demolition of a house or commercial property, the concerned authorities must satisfy themselves that no other option was available before them.

It said construction of a house is result of years of dream, aspirations and collective hope of family.

The court, in order to allay the fears of the citizens, issued directions under Article 142 of the Constitution to do complete justice to direct a 15 days notice must be given to the person before resorting to demolition, spelling out the nature and extent of unauthorised constructions.

In its directions, the court also ordered for creation of a digital portal detailing such action by the state authorities.

It said demolition order would not be implemented for 15 days and all the proceedings should be videographed and preserved and be displayed on digital portal.

The bench clarified violation of its order by any officer would lead to contempt proceedings and prosecution separately.

The officers will be held for responsible for restitution of the property and payment of damage in such cases, it said.

The court directed for sending its order to all the High Courts and state governments for issuance of a circular for the officers concerned.

The bench also clarified the directions would not be applicable to unauthorised constructions on public lands, roads, water bodies and lands abutting railways.

A plea filed by Jamiat Ulama I Hind and others against arbitrary actions by state governments across the country.

The case was listed as 'In Re: Directions in the Matter of Demolition of Structures'.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

father-of-deceased-pilot-in-ahmedabad-crash-moves-sc-for-court-monitored-probe
Trending Judiciary
Father of deceased pilot in Ahmedabad crash moves SC for court monitored probe

91-year-old father of pilot killed in Ahmedabad Air India crash moves SC seeking court-monitored probe into alleged biased and flawed investigation.

17 October, 2025 10:54 AM
child-cant-consent-to-sex-life-imprisonment-upheld-for-sexual-assault-on-minor-girl-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Can’t Consent to Sex — Life Imprisonment Upheld for Sexual Assault on Minor Girl: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC upholds life imprisonment for assault on minor SC girl, reiterating that a child cannot consent to sex; school records key for age proof.

17 October, 2025 11:45 AM
sc-criticizes-casual-declaration-of-witnesses-as-hostile-upholds-conviction-under-sc-st-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticizes Casual Declaration of Witnesses as Hostile, Upholds Conviction under SC/ST Act [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court slams casual practice of declaring witnesses hostile; upholds life imprisonment in SC/ST Act case involving rape of minor girl.

17 October, 2025 11:55 AM
delhi-hc-quashes-22-year-old-complaint-against-advocate-reiterates-that-a-lawyers-office-is-not-a-commercial-activity
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year Old Complaint Against Advocate, Reiterates That A Lawyer’s Office Is Not A Commercial Activity [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC quashes 22-year-old complaint against advocate, rules that a lawyer’s office is not a commercial activity under MDP 2001 and Building Bye-Laws.

17 October, 2025 01:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email