38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, December 20, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC notice to Centre on plea to raise marriageable age of Muslim girls

By LawStreet News Network      10 December, 2022 01:37 AM      0 Comments
SC notice to Centre on plea to raise marriageable age of Muslim girls

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to Centre on a plea by National Commission for Women to increase marriageable age of Muslim girls to ensure enforcement of the fundamental rights of minors guaranteed under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution.

The plea also sought to make the marriageable age of girls of all communities as 18 years, irrespective of their religion.

A bench led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud sought a response from the Union government on the plea, filed through advocate Nitin Saluja.

The plea sought a direction on the equal application of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, IPC, and Prohibition of Child Marriage (PCM) Act, irrespective of religion or personal laws.

The plea said sought the enforcement of the fundamental rights of minor Muslim women, guaranteed under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution, by equal application of the penal laws in cases where Muslim women, who have contracted a marriage before attaining the age of majority, whether consensually or otherwise.

"The Muslim personal law, which permits children to get married on attaining puberty i.e., at the age of 15 years, is in the teeth of the penal provisions. The penal provisions are age centric and not religion centric / personal law centric.There is no exception whatsoever provided under the said provisions on the basis of religion of the child and the same applies equally to all the children, notwithstanding the personal law by which the child is governed, his/her religion, caste, marital status, etc," it said.

"The distinction or classification on the basis of puberty' has no scientific backing or reasonable nexus with the eligibility for marriage / capacity to get married. A person who has attained puberty may be biologically capable of reproduction, however, the same does not imply that the said person is mentally and psychologically mature enough to get married and physically mature to engage in sexual acts and consequently, bear children," it added.

Earlier, the top court had separately issued notice to the Union government and others a plea by the National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights which had questioned the validity of a Punjab and Haryana High Court's recent judgement validating marriage of a 16-year-old minor girl under the Muslim Personal Laws.

In its plea, the NCW sought a direction to increase of 'marriageable age' under the Muslim personal law to bring it in consonance with the penal laws.

The 'minimum age of marriage' under various personal laws, other than the Muslim personal law, is consistent and in consonance with other prevailing penal laws. Under the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872, Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936, Special Marriage Act, 1954 and Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the 'minimum age of marriage' for a man is 21 years and for a woman is 18 years," the plea said.

Under the Muslim personal law in India, which continues to remain uncodified and unconsolidated, persons who have attained puberty are eligible to get married i.e., on attaining the age of 15 years (in absence of evidence), while they are still minor.

The same is not only arbitrary, irrational and discriminatory but also violative of the provisions of penal laws. The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, has been enacted to protect children (below 18 years), particularly women, from offences of sexual assault, sexual harassment, etc, it added.

The plea contended that as per Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which defines the offence of "rape", the consent of a women below the age of 18 years is not a valid consent in the eyes of the law and any sexual activity, as defined therein, with a minor, with or without consent, is a punishable offence.

Solemnization of a marriage of man below the age of 21 years and of a woman below the age of 18 years is a punishable offence under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. Thus, the Muslim personal law, which permits children to get married on attaining puberty i.e., at the age of 15 years, is in the teeth of the penal provisions," the plea said.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM
cash-debt-exceeding-20000-does-not-invalidate-cheque-dishonour-cases-under-section-138-of-the-ni-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Cash Debt Exceeding ₹20,000 Does Not Invalidate Cheque Dishonour Cases Under Section 138 of the NI Act: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that cash loans above ₹20,000 do not invalidate cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the NI Act despite I-T Act violations.

14 December, 2025 02:23 AM
sc-upholds-10-year-sentence-for-woman-in-commercial-quantity-ganja-case-rejects-pleas-based-on-sampling-irregularities
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds 10-Year Sentence for Woman in Commercial Quantity Ganja Case, Rejects Pleas Based on Sampling Irregularities [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds 10-year sentence under NDPS Act in commercial ganja case, ruling that sampling irregularities alone do not vitiate prosecution.

14 December, 2025 02:30 AM
sc-upholds-bail-in-2010-jnaneswari-express-derailment-case-issues-directions-on-speedy-trials-under-uapa
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Bail in 2010 Jnaneswari Express Derailment Case, Issues Directions on Speedy Trials Under UAPA [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds bail in the 2010 Jnaneswari Express derailment case while issuing sweeping directions to ensure speedy trials in UAPA cases.

14 December, 2025 02:39 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email