38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, September 27, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC notice to Centre, States on presidential reference on timelines to clear Bills

By Jhanak Sharma      22 July, 2025 05:26 PM      0 Comments
SC notice to Centre States on presidential reference on timelines to clear Bills

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice to the Centre and all state governments on a presidential reference on validity of prescribing timelines for Governors and the President to act on Bills passed by the state legislatures.

Considering the reference made on May 13, this year, a special bench led by CJI Gavai and comprising Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, P S Narasimha and Atul S Chandurkar, said the issue would affect the entire country.

The court said, it will issue notice to the Centre and all states, and the notice will be returnable in one week.

The bench also sought assistance of Attorney General R Venkataramani.

The bench said that it will begin the hearing on the matter in August.

Senior advocate K K Venugopal contended before the bench that he is appearing for Kerala, which is raising issues on maintainability.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said it is premature to raise such an issue before the bench.

The bench said it will assemble on next Tuesday.

Senior advocate P Wilson, representing the Tamil Nadu government, said he is also raising the issue of maintainability, and stressed that it will directly affect his state.

After the apex court's April 8 judgment on fixing the timeline to clear the Bills with regard to Tamil Nadu Assembly, President Droupadi Murmu has made the reference to the Supreme Court to decide if this can be done through judicial orders in the absence of the constitutionally prescribed timeline for it.

In its April 8, 2025 judgment, a bench of Justice J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan declared Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi's decision to reserve 10 bills for President after those were re-enacted, as illegal.

The court had then set the timeline, saying that the President is required to take a decision on the bills reserved for his consideration by the Governor within a period of three months.

The judgment, which also declared all those Bills without assent of the Governor or the President as passed using its power under Article 142 of the Constitution, came under sharp attack from certain quarters for being in judicial overreach and in violation of the principle of separation of powers.

Then Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar, Kerala governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar, and senior government officials called out the apex court for setting deadlines for the Executive wing of the government, and its use of Article 142 to clear Bills.

Days after the President made the reference in exercise of power under Article 143(1) of the Constitution which allows the top constitutional head to seek the opinion of the Supreme Court on any question of law or fact of public importance.

The advisory jurisdiction allows the President to consult the Supreme Court on significant issues.

In the reference made on May 13, 2025, the President sought opinion of the Supreme Court on 14 questions, including whether the exercise of constitutional discretion by the President under Article 201 of the Constitution of India is justiciable.

"Are the decisions of the Governor and the President under Article 200 and Article 201 of the Constitution, respectively, justiciable at a stage anterior into the law coming into force? Is it permissible for the Courts to undertake judicial adjudication over the contents of a Bill, in any manner, before it becomes law," the reference asked.

It also asked if the exercise of constitutional powers and the orders of/by the President / Governor can be substituted in any manner under Article 142 of the Constitution of India.

It also sought opinion if a law made by the State legislature is a law in force without the assent of the Governor granted under Article 200 of the Constitution.

"In view of the proviso to Article 145(3) of the Constitution, is it not mandatory for any bench of this court to first decide as to whether the question involved in the proceedings before it is of such a nature which involves substantial questions of law as to the interpretation of constitution and to refer it to a bench of minimum five judges," it further asked.

The reference also asked if the powers of the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution are limited to matters of procedural law or Article 142 of the Constitution of India extends to issuing directions/passing orders which are contrary to or inconsistent with existing substantive or procedural provisions of the Constitution or law in force.

"Does the Constitution bar any other jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to resolve disputes between the Union Government and the State Governments except by way of a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India," it also asked.

The President felt in prevailing circumstances when the States are frequently approached the Supreme Court invoking Article 32 and 131 of the Constitution, it was expedient to seek the opinion of the Supreme Court on legal questions.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-permits-ramlila-at-school-playground-in-up
Trending Judiciary
SC permits Ramlila at school playground in UP

SC allows Ramlila at UP school ground, noting 100-year tradition, but urges finding alternate sites to keep playgrounds free for students.

26 September, 2025 12:08 AM
sc-stays-hcs-order-on-composition-of-sit-formed-to-probe-tirupati-parasadam-row
Trending Judiciary
SC stays HC's order on composition of SIT formed to probe Tirupati parasadam row

SC stays Andhra Pradesh HC order on SIT composition in Tirupati prasadam row, clarifying CBI Director’s role in appointing investigation officer.

26 September, 2025 07:53 PM

TOP STORIES

calcutta-hc-dismisses-plea-against-bengali-singer-for-allegedly-insulting-lord-ram-cites-lack-of-evidence
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses Plea Against Bengali Singer For Allegedly Insulting Lord Ram, Cites Lack of Evidence [Read Judgment]

Calcutta HC dismisses plea against singer Nachiketa Chakraborty over alleged remarks on Lord Ram, citing lack of evidence and jurisdiction.

22 September, 2025 10:43 AM
allahabad-hc-slams-police-for-recording-caste-of-accused-in-firs-terms-it-identity-profiling
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Slams Police for Recording Caste of Accused in FIRs, Terms It “Identity Profiling” [Read Order]

Allahabad HC condemns police for recording caste of accused in FIRs, calling it identity profiling that violates fundamental rights and constitutional values.

22 September, 2025 11:04 AM
spouse-may-claim-damages-for-marital-interference-by-third-party-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Spouse May Claim Damages for Marital Interference by Third Party: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC allows spouse to sue lover for ‘alienation of affection’, recognizing civil action for intentional interference in marriage.

22 September, 2025 01:06 PM
sc-notice-to-centre-others-on-plea-for-court-monitored-probe-into-air-india-crash
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to Centre, others on plea for court-monitored probe into Air India crash

SC issues notice on plea for court-monitored probe into Air India crash that killed 260; petitioner seeks independent, transparent, and fair investigation.

22 September, 2025 02:27 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email