38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, April 14, 2024

SC Notice To UP Govt. On Plea Opposing Dropping Of Riot Case Against Yogi

By LawStreet News Network      21 August, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
SC Notice To UP Govt. On Plea Opposing Dropping Of Riot Case Against Yogi

On Monday, August 20, 2018, a Supreme Court Bench comprising of Chief JusticeDipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud issued a notice seeking a reply from the state government of Uttar Pradesh within four weeks in connection with an alleged hate speech delivered by Yogi Adityanath in 2007.

The Supreme Court asked the government to reply as to why Adityanath should not be prosecuted for delivering an alleged hate speech in 2007, as per reports.

In January 2007, an altercation erupted between a Hindu and Muslim group in Gorakhpur. On January 27, 2007, an FIR was lodged at Kotwali police station in Gorakhpur against Yogi Adityanath, then a Member of Parliament, and several others on charges of promoting enmity between the two groups. It was alleged that several incidents of violence were reported in Gorakhpur on that day after an alleged hate speech delivered by Adityanath.

In November 2008, a petition was filed by Mohammad Asad Hayat and Parvez mentioning that a hate speech by Yogi Adityanath triggered riots in which one man got killed. Parvez filed an FIR in connection with this case and Hayat was a witness in it.

Indeed, delivering hate speeches creates chaos and panic in the nation, though to prevent them, presently, in our country the following provisions in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 have bearing on hate speech, namely:-

Section 153A penalises ‘promotion of enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony’. The offence is punishable with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

Section 153B penalises ‘imputations, assertions prejudicial to national-integration’. The offence is punishable with imprisonment which may extend to three years.

Section 298 penalises ‘uttering, words, etc., with deliberate intent to wound the religious feelings of any person’. The offence is punishable with imprisonment which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.

Section 505(1) and (2) penalises publication or circulation of any statement, rumour or report causing public mischief and enmity, hatred or ill-will between classes. The offence is punishable with imprisonment which may extend to three years.

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Interview
LSJ Exclusive Interview: How BJP govt will free Chhattisgarh from “Naxal menace”? [Watch Video]

What is Chhattisgarh govt's plan for solving the Maoist/Naxalite problem in the state? Will there be a surgical strike against the Naxals or solution will be found via diplomatic channels? Read the Exclusive Interview with the Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sharma.

13 April, 2024 12:33 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects review of order to pay Rs 1.54 Cr compensation to ex Air Force staff for transfusion of HIV infected blood [Read Order]

SC denies review of Rs 1.54 Cr HIV compensation order to ex-Air Force staff for medical negligence.

13 April, 2024 03:13 PM


Trending Judiciary
Very disturbed by latest trend of lawyers commenting on pending cases: CJI

Chief Justice of India urges lawyers to prioritize court and Constitution over political beliefs, expressing concern over trend of commenting on pending cases.

08 April, 2024 11:19 AM
Trending Judiciary
Court rejects plea for interim bail to BRS leader K Kavitha

Delhi court rejects interim bail plea for BRS leader K Kavitha in money laundering case related to Delhi liquor scam. ED opposes bail.

08 April, 2024 12:14 PM
Trending Judiciary
Centre questions growing tendency among States to approach SC for funds

The Centre questions the growing trend of states approaching the Supreme Court for funds, citing timing and advocating for resolution through dialogue.

08 April, 2024 03:58 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to Centre on plea to safeguard interests of intersex children

Supreme Court issues notice to Centre on PIL for safeguarding intersex children's interests and regulating medical interventions. Details inside.

08 April, 2024 04:35 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email