38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC orders status quo on liquidation of Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd [Read Order]

By Jhanak Sharma      27 May, 2025 01:38 PM      0 Comments
SC orders status quo on liquidation of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday ordered status quo in the liquidation proceedings of Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd (BPSL) pending before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

This has come as a reprieve for JSW Steel, which suffered a major setback after the apex court had on May 2, 2025 declared its Rs 19,700-crore resolution plan for debt-ridden Bhushan Power & Steel, as illegal and in violation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Taking up a plea by JSW Steel, a bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma issued the direction in order to avoid future legal complications as the time to seek review of the previous judgment of May 2 in this regard has yet not expired.

JSW Steel Ltd sought abeyance of any further hearing in applications filed be the erstwhile promoters of BPSL to expedite liquidation proceedings pending before the NCLT.

Senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, appearing on behalf of JSW Steel Ltd, contended that even before the time for filing a review against the court’s May 2 judgment is over, the NCLT is proceeding to appoint a liquidator. He argued before the bench that JSW has time till June 2, to file the review.

He said Sanjay Singhal, the first respondent and ex- promoters are seeking an expeditious implementation of the directions issued by this court. The counsel also said any implementation of those directions, at this stage, would only jeopardise the consideration of the review petition to be filed by the appellant.

In the circumstances, he urged that a practical solution be reached pending consideration and disposal of the review petition by this
court.

After hearing the counsel, the bench said, "Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, at this juncture we find that the interest of justice would be served and in order to avoid future legal complications in the matter, an order of status quo of the proceedings pending before the National Company Law Tribunal is issued by this Court."

The court also clarified that this order in this appeal has been made by way of an interim arrangement pending consideration and disposal of the review petition to be filed by the appellant.

"We also record the submission that the review petition would be filed before this court prior to the expiry of the limitation period and in accordance with law," the bench said.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta also appeared in the matter.

In previous judgment, a bench headed by Justice Bela M Trivedi (since retired) declared that JSW Steel's resolution plan was illegal and should not have been accepted by the committee of creditors of the debt-ridden company.

The court had noted JSW Steel, committee of creditors and the resolution professional sought to sweep many seminal issues under the carpet to cover up gross violations of the provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The bench found non-compliance and violations of mandatory provisions of the 2016 Code at the instance of JSW Steel, committee of creditors and resolution professionals at pre-approval and post-approval stages of resolution.

"Nobody should be permitted to misuse the process of law or should be permitted to take undue advantage of the pendency of any proceedings in the court or tribunal," the bench had said.

The bench had also noted malafide and dishonest intention on the part of JSW Steel in securing the highest score for its plan, making misrepresentation before court and then not implementing the same under the garb of the Enforcement Directorate proceedings against Bhushan Steel.

JSW Steel had secured the highest score, but even after the approval of its plan, it willfully contravened and did not comply with the terms of the said resolution plan for a period of over two years, defeating the very object and purpose of the IBC, the bench had said.

In 2017, the National Company Law Tribunal began insolvency proceedings against Bhushan Power & Steel on a petition by Punjab National Bank in 2017.

In 2019, it approved the resolution plan submitted by JSW Steel for the debt-ridden company.

The Enforcement Directorate also registered a case against Bhushan Power and its officers for money-laundering offences on charges of defrauding banks to the tune of Rs 47,204 crore, which was subsequently set aside by the Delhi High Court.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-sets-aside-bail-to-actor-darshan-warns-jail-officials-against-vip-treatment
Trending CelebStreet
SC sets aside bail to actor Darshan; warns jail officials against VIP treatment

SC cancels bail to actor Darshan in murder case; slams VIP jail perks, warns officials to uphold rule of law and treat all accused equally.

14 August, 2025 12:30 PM
sc-refuses-stay-on-directions-for-immediate-shifting-of-stray-dogs-to-shelter-homes
Trending Judiciary
SC refuses stay on directions for immediate shifting of stray dogs to shelter homes

SC refuses to stay order directing urgent relocation of stray dogs in Delhi-NCR; asks intervenors to file affidavits amid rising dog bite concerns.

14 August, 2025 03:33 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email