38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC protects J-K family from deportation

By Jhanak Sharma      02 May, 2025 02:51 PM      0 Comments
SC protects J and K family from deportation

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday protected a family from Srinagar in Jammu and Kashmir, from deportation till their claims of citizenship were verified.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh directed the Union government from taking any coercive action as they alleged apprehension of deportation after Union government's April 25 order revoking visa of Pakistani nationals.

The court asked the authorities of the central government to verify the Indian citizenship claims of six persons as they contended they have got Indian passports and Aadhaar cards.

The court said till the decision is taken, no coercive action be taken against the family.

The bench disposed of the petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the High Court if they were aggrieved with the order of the authorities.

The petitioners claimed they were working in Bengaluru, and the others, parents and sisters, are in Srinagar. He said that the family members in Srinagar faced the threat of being thrown out of the country after moves initiated after the Pahalgam terrorist attack, which claimed lives of 26 people.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, the petitioners should approach the authorities concerned.

Petitioner Ahmed Tariq Butt claimed his family consists of his father Tariq Mushkoor Butt, his mother Nusrat Butt, his elder sister Smt Aisha Tariq, his younger brother Abubakar Tarik Butt and another younger brother Umar Tariq Butt.

The family were residents of Mirpur till the year 1997. His father of the moved to the city of Srinagar from Mirpur in the year 1997. The other family members including the petitioner also moved to the city of Srinagar from Mirpur in the year 2000.

The plea claimed the petitioner and his family are all Indian Nationals and have Indian passports issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs and are Indian citizens. The petitioner claimed he and his siblings all got educated in a private school in Srinagar.

The plea contended the petitioner's father, mother, sister and his younger brother were arrested by the Jammu and Kashmir Police on April 29, 2025 at around 9 PM illegally. They were taken to the India-Pakistan Border on April 30 2025 at around 12.20 PM and are at present being forced to leave India from the Border. Deportation is imminent even though they are Indian Nationals, the plea said.

The family members were issued notices by the FRO has illegally and baselessly claimed that the Petitioner No 1 and his family members have entered India in the year 1997 and there was an obligation to leave India on expiration of their visa on the premise that they are Pakistani Nationals. 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email