On Monday (July 23rd, 2018) Supreme Court of India said that “complete ban” on holding protests and sit-ins at Jantar Mantar cannot be imposed, therefore Top Court has asked the centre to prepare the guidelines for according sanctions to such events.
A bench of Supreme Court of India comprised of
Justice A.K. Sikri and Justice Ashok Bhushan said while directing the Centre to prepare guidelines on the matter, “
There cannot be a complete ban on holding protests at places like Jantar Mantar and Boat Club (near India Gate),” and there was a need for striking a balance between conflicting rights such as the right to protest and right of citizens to live peacefully. In the batch of petitions, this verdict was filed by
Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sanghtan who was challenging the decision which was given by the
National Green Tribunal for banning all kinds of protests at places like Jantar Mantar and the Boat Club.
SC Gives Judgement in Suo Moto Case for Expeditious Trial of Cases Under Section 138 OF N.I. Act 1881 [READ ORDER]
Judiciary
Apr 19, 2021
Mathews Savio
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
9 Shares
A five-member bench of the Supreme Court gave its judgement in a Suo Moto case relating to the expeditious trial of cases relating to dishonoured cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The bench which heard the matter included Chief Justice S. A. Bobde along with Justices L. Nageswara Rao, B. R. Gavai, A. S. Bopanna and S. Ravindra Bhat.In 2016 while considering a matter related to the dishonour of two cheques which were pending before the courts for 16...
Fictional Convenience of One Party Cannot be a Ground to Transfer Cases U/S 25 Of CPC: SC [READ ORDER]
Judiciary
Apr 19, 2021
Mathews Savio
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
7 Shares
While deciding a transfer petition concerning a commercial dispute (M/S Fumo Chem Pvt. Ltd. V. M/S Raj Process Equipments And Systems Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.) the Supreme Court observed that mere convenience of one of the parties is not a ground to transfer cases under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.The matter was decided by a Single-Judge Bench comprising of Justice Aniruddha Bose through Video Conferencing.The commercial dispute was about the supply of certain items. The...
Facebook Comments