38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC questions inordinate delay in deciding mercy plea of convict in CM assassination case

By Jhanak Sharma      25 September, 2025 12:47 AM      0 Comments
SC questions inordinate delay in deciding mercy plea of convict in CM assassination case

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday questioned the inordinate delay in deciding mercy plea in respect of Balwant Singh Rajoana, convicted for the assassination of Punjab Chief Minister Beant Singh in 1995.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and N V Anjaria asked the Centre, "Why didn't you hang him till now? Who is to blame for that, at least, we have not stayed his execution, we suppose."

Upon hearing senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi for Rajoana, the court made it clear to the Centre that on the next date of hearing it should have clear instructions, as it would not adjourn the matter.

Rohatgi contended that there were people in the same attack, and Devender Bhullar was one of them, and in Bhullar's case, he was sentenced to death and his petition was dismissed by the apex court. It was argued before the bench in the curative petition, Bhullar's case was commuted to life, and Bhullar was out.

"Don't know what will happen (in my client's case). If this death has to go then commutation must happen, and if commutation happens, he is bound to be out today after 30 years,'' Rohatgi said.

The bench said that the court is not aware of the Punjab rules, but in Rajasthan, he would not have come out because these are exceptions under the prison rules.

Rohatgi said, but persons involved in the same incident are already out of prison. He said this court has held repeatedly, being on death row for more than 2 years or 3 years, it is sufficient in violation of Article 21.

"Today, it is 15 years. He was convicted in 2007 or 2006. It was confirmed by the high court…sometimes the Centre says that others have filed appeals in the Supreme Court. I am not concerned with others,'' Rohatgi said.

The counsel said his client did not file an appeal in the top court. The bench asked Rohatgi to place Bhullar's judgment on record. The bench was informed that a review petition has been filed regarding the judgment in Rajoana's case.

The bench was informed that it has been filed on the grounds that the mercy petition in Rajoana's case was given by the Gurdwara Management Committee and not by the petitioner, and therefore, there cannot be deemed to be inordinate delay in the disposal of it. The bench said it wants to see the judgment in Bhullar's case.

Rohatgi said if his client is released from prison, how is it concerned with the security of the state?

"It is not an India-Pakistan issue, he is also a human being and an Indian citizen. He is entitled to equal application of laws," he said.

Nataraj said a sitting chief minister was murdered, and consequential riots broke out in the state. Rohatgi said, "then you should have executed him."

"Why didn't you hang him till now? Who is to blame for that, at least we have not stayed his execution, we suppose", the bench asked Nataraj, who replied that he will get back to the court on the present situation.

On November 25, 2024, the Centre had said the matter regarding a decision on death row convict Rajoana's mercy plea is sensitive, after which the court granted it four more weeks to take a decision on it.

Rajoana, 58 years, a member of the banned Babbar Khalsa, has been sentenced to the death penalty in the case related to the assassination of Beant Singh.

The apex court on November 18, 2024, had directed President Droupadi Murmu's secretary to place before her the mercy petition with a request to decide the matter within two weeks. However, the apex court put its order on hold upon a request by the Solicitor General.

The bench listed the matter again for hearing on October 15.

Rajoana was linked to the Babbar Khalsa, a militant Sikh separatist group responsible for violent activities during the insurgency in Punjab. The Centre has maintained that his release is a matter of national security and linked it to the concerns regarding the resurgence of pro-Khalistan sentiment.

On August 31, 1995, in a bomb blast, Beant Singh, along with 16 others, lost their lives, and a dozen others were injured. The petitioner was arrested on January 27, 1996. The trial court on July 27, 2007, convicted the petitioner along with co-accused Jagtar Singh Hawara, Gurmeet Singh, Lakhwinder Singh, Shamsher Singh and Nasib Singh.

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

madras-hc-directs-ms-dhoni-to-pay-10-lakh-for-transcription-of-cds-in-defamation-suit
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Directs MS Dhoni to Pay ₹10 Lakh for Transcription of CDs in Defamation Suit [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs MS Dhoni to pay ₹10 lakh for transcription and translation of CDs in his defamation suit against Zee Media.

13 February, 2026 02:36 PM
sc-holds-successive-fir-registration-to-keep-accused-in-custody-is-abuse-of-process-grants-bail-under-article-32
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Successive FIR Registration to Keep Accused in Custody Is Abuse of Process; Grants Bail Under Article 32 [Read Order]

Supreme Court calls successive FIRs to keep accused in custody an abuse of process, grants bail under Article 32 in Jharkhand case.

13 February, 2026 02:48 PM
sc-holds-post-arbitral-award-transferee-cannot-resist-execution-reaffirms-lis-pendens-doctrine-applies-to-money-decrees
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Post-Arbitral Award Transferee Cannot Resist Execution; Reaffirms Lis Pendens Doctrine Applies to Money Decrees [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules post-arbitral award purchasers can’t block execution; lis pendens applies to money decrees under Transfer of Property Act.

13 February, 2026 02:59 PM
sc-holds-anticipatory-bail-has-no-time-limit-protection-continues-after-chargesheet
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Anticipatory Bail Has No Time Limit, Protection Continues After Chargesheet [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules anticipatory bail has no time limit, continues after chargesheet, and High Courts can’t restrict protection to investigation stage.

13 February, 2026 03:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email