38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, December 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Refuses To Entertain Plea Challenging Centre's Circular Against Use Of Term 'Dalit' By Media

By LawStreet News Network      18 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
SC Refuses To Entertain Plea Challenging Centre's Circular Against Use Of Term 'Dalit' By Media

The Supreme Court today (February 18, 2019) refused to entertain a plea challenging the Constitutional validity of a circular issued by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to ban the usage of the word Dalit by media while referring to members of the Scheduled Caste.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and comprising of JusticeSanjiv Khanna was hearing a batch of petitions filed by individuals and organisations working in the field of protection and promotion of the cause of Dalits.

In the plea, the petitioners had contended that the circular is arbitrary, irrational, unreasonable, discriminatory and contrary to Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India as it violates the rights of the Scheduled Castes to determine and express their own identity. Further, it was also submitted that by erasing the term Dalit from public debate, is creating a false impression that the term itself is derogatory.

Moreover, referring to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989, the petitioners had contended that the Impugned Circular seeks to circumvent the legislative mechanism that already exists for adjudication of such issues.

The ministry, by a circular dated August 7, 2018, had advised the media to refrain from using the nomenclature Dalit while referring to members belonging to Scheduled Caste and directed to use appropriate translation in other national languages for all official transaction, matters, dealings, certificates etc. for denoting the persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes.

The circular was issued pursuant to an order of the Bombay High Court dated June 6, 2018, wherein the court asked the ministry to consider issuing a directive in this regard to the media.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

working-wife-with-sufficient-income-not-entitled-to-interim-maintenance-but-childs-maintenance-must-be-paid-from-date-of-application-bombay-hc
Trending Judiciary
Working Wife with Sufficient Income Not Entitled to Interim Maintenance, but Child’s Maintenance Must Be Paid from Date of Application: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]

Bombay High Court rules that a working wife with sufficient income is not entitled to interim maintenance; child’s maintenance must be paid from the date of application.

16 December, 2025 09:01 PM

TOP STORIES

kangana-ranaut-slams-rahul-gandhis-vote-chori-claim-in-lok-sabha-questions-evidence-on-voter-fraud
Trending Executive
Kangana Ranaut Slams Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Vote Chori’ Claim in Lok Sabha, Questions Evidence on Voter Fraud

Kangana Ranaut challenges Rahul Gandhi’s voter fraud allegations in Parliament, reigniting debate on electoral integrity and institutional trust.

11 December, 2025 06:47 PM
sc-arbitrators-mandate-ends-after-statutory-deadline-substitution-mandatory-under-section-29a
Trending Judiciary
SC: Arbitrator’s Mandate Ends After Statutory Deadline; Substitution Mandatory Under Section 29A [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that an arbitrator’s mandate ends after the statutory period expires and mandates substitution under Section 29A for continued proceedings.

11 December, 2025 06:52 PM
sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email