38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Refuses To Entertain Plea Challenging Centre's Circular Against Use Of Term 'Dalit' By Media

By LawStreet News Network      18 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
SC Refuses To Entertain Plea Challenging Centre's Circular Against Use Of Term 'Dalit' By Media

The Supreme Court today (February 18, 2019) refused to entertain a plea challenging the Constitutional validity of a circular issued by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to ban the usage of the word Dalit by media while referring to members of the Scheduled Caste.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and comprising of JusticeSanjiv Khanna was hearing a batch of petitions filed by individuals and organisations working in the field of protection and promotion of the cause of Dalits.

In the plea, the petitioners had contended that the circular is arbitrary, irrational, unreasonable, discriminatory and contrary to Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India as it violates the rights of the Scheduled Castes to determine and express their own identity. Further, it was also submitted that by erasing the term Dalit from public debate, is creating a false impression that the term itself is derogatory.

Moreover, referring to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989, the petitioners had contended that the Impugned Circular seeks to circumvent the legislative mechanism that already exists for adjudication of such issues.

The ministry, by a circular dated August 7, 2018, had advised the media to refrain from using the nomenclature Dalit while referring to members belonging to Scheduled Caste and directed to use appropriate translation in other national languages for all official transaction, matters, dealings, certificates etc. for denoting the persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes.

The circular was issued pursuant to an order of the Bombay High Court dated June 6, 2018, wherein the court asked the ministry to consider issuing a directive in this regard to the media.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email