38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 14, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Refuses To Entertain Plea Challenging Centre's Circular Against Use Of Term 'Dalit' By Media

By LawStreet News Network      18 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
SC Refuses To Entertain Plea Challenging Centre's Circular Against Use Of Term 'Dalit' By Media

The Supreme Court today (February 18, 2019) refused to entertain a plea challenging the Constitutional validity of a circular issued by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to ban the usage of the word Dalit by media while referring to members of the Scheduled Caste.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and comprising of JusticeSanjiv Khanna was hearing a batch of petitions filed by individuals and organisations working in the field of protection and promotion of the cause of Dalits.

In the plea, the petitioners had contended that the circular is arbitrary, irrational, unreasonable, discriminatory and contrary to Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India as it violates the rights of the Scheduled Castes to determine and express their own identity. Further, it was also submitted that by erasing the term Dalit from public debate, is creating a false impression that the term itself is derogatory.

Moreover, referring to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989, the petitioners had contended that the Impugned Circular seeks to circumvent the legislative mechanism that already exists for adjudication of such issues.

The ministry, by a circular dated August 7, 2018, had advised the media to refrain from using the nomenclature Dalit while referring to members belonging to Scheduled Caste and directed to use appropriate translation in other national languages for all official transaction, matters, dealings, certificates etc. for denoting the persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes.

The circular was issued pursuant to an order of the Bombay High Court dated June 6, 2018, wherein the court asked the ministry to consider issuing a directive in this regard to the media.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email