38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

There Is A Need To Publicize Why The Act Was Passed Says SC Refusing To Stay CAA, 2019

By Lawstreet Bharat      18 December, 2019 04:12 PM      0 Comments
There Is A Need To Publicize Why The Act Was Passed Says SC Refusing To Stay CAA, 2019

The Supreme Court today refused to grant an order staying the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019The court has issued notice to the Centre. The next hearing is scheduled for January 22, 2020. 

The Supreme Court heard 60 petitions filed against the CAA together. A total of 59 petitions were listed before a bench comprising of the Chief Justice of India, SA Bobde, Justices BR Gavai and Surya Kant. Among the petitioners were Jairam Ramesh of Congress, Asaduddin Owaisi of AIMIM, Mahua Moitra of TMC, RJD's Manoj Jha, the Jamiat Ulema-a-Hind and the Indian Union Muslim League.

The Attorney General of India, K.K. Venugopal argued that, There are four judgments of the SC that say that the Act cannot be stayed.

Rajeev Dhavan said that the Act hadnt come into existence, its rules are yet to notified. The CJI told lawyers who were still pressing for a stay of CAA, 2019 even after the next case was called that, We are not going to hear this case today. There is a need to publicise why the Act (CAA) is passed. To which Venugopal agreed saying that, We will do that. The Chief Justice's comments had come on a submission made by Advocate AK Upadhyay that there is a lot of confusion regarding the objective of CAA, 2019.

Earlier, senior Congress leader and former Union Minister Jairam Ramesh and Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra challenged the Citizenship Amendment Act by filing petitions in the Supreme Court. The petition has sought quashing of the Citizenship Amendment Act as unconstitutional.

Jairam Ramesh's petition demanded that the Supreme Court declare the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 as a violation of the Right to Equality, and that the Court declare that this law is against the Assam Accord of 1985. Jairam Ramesh also demanded that the court declare that the Act violates international treaties that India has signed.



Share this article:

About:
Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email