38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 10, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Rejects PIL Against Arun Jaitley, Imposes Rs 50,000 Fine On ML Sharma

By LawStreet News Network      07 December, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
SC Rejects PIL Against Arun Jaitley, Imposes Rs 50,000 Fine On ML Sharma

The Supreme Court on December 7, 2018, while dismissing a public interest litigation (PIL) against Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on advocate M.L. Sharma, who had filed the PIL.

A Bench comprising of Chief Justice of IndiaRanjan Gogoi and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul came down heavily on advocate M.L. Sharma for filing frivolous public interest litigation petitions.

Advocate M.L. Sharma had filed the PIL accusing the Finance Minister of "plundering" the capital reserve of the RBI.

The Bench dismissed the petition stating we find no reason whatsoever to entertain this PIL and imposed the fine as Sharma continued with the arguments even after dismissal of the PIL.

Interestingly, before imposing the fine, CJI Gogoi acknowledged that Sharma had done some good work, but he was bent on destroying his reputation by persistently filing frivolous PILs.

You have done some good work and we all acknowledge that. Why are you persisting on destroying your reputation? What kind of prayer is this to restrain Finance Minister from using capital reserves of RBI.

Now what is happening is that because of this, when you come with a good case also, we dont entertain you, said Gogoi J.

This is not the first time that the apex court has berated Sharma, earlier in 2015, then Chief Justice of India R.M. Lodha had imposed costs of Rs. 25,000 and Rs. 50,000 on him on two separate occasions.

JusticeD.Y. Chandrachud had also rapped Sharma for filing a PIL with unfounded claims against Union Ministers including the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister in relation to the Nirav Modi scam.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-allows-judicial-officers-with-7-years-experience-as-advocates-to-apply-for-district-judges
Trending Legal Insiders
SC allows judicial officers with 7 years experience as advocates to apply for district judges [Read Judgment]

SC allows judicial officers with 7 years’ Bar experience to apply for district judge posts; ruling ensures level playing field and directs states to frame eligibility rules.

09 October, 2025 11:07 AM
sc-sets-aside-conviction-death-sentence-awarded-to-man-in-sexual-assault-murder-of-7-yr-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
SC sets aside conviction, death sentence awarded to man in sexual assault, murder of 7-yr-old girl [Read Judgment]

SC acquits man on death row in 2017 Tamil Nadu case, citing prosecution’s failure and unfair trial; says courts can’t convict on moral grounds alone.

09 October, 2025 12:39 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email