38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, September 19, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Rejects PIL Against Arun Jaitley, Imposes Rs 50,000 Fine On ML Sharma

By LawStreet News Network      07 December, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
SC Rejects PIL Against Arun Jaitley, Imposes Rs 50,000 Fine On ML Sharma

The Supreme Court on December 7, 2018, while dismissing a public interest litigation (PIL) against Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on advocate M.L. Sharma, who had filed the PIL.

A Bench comprising of Chief Justice of IndiaRanjan Gogoi and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul came down heavily on advocate M.L. Sharma for filing frivolous public interest litigation petitions.

Advocate M.L. Sharma had filed the PIL accusing the Finance Minister of "plundering" the capital reserve of the RBI.

The Bench dismissed the petition stating we find no reason whatsoever to entertain this PIL and imposed the fine as Sharma continued with the arguments even after dismissal of the PIL.

Interestingly, before imposing the fine, CJI Gogoi acknowledged that Sharma had done some good work, but he was bent on destroying his reputation by persistently filing frivolous PILs.

You have done some good work and we all acknowledge that. Why are you persisting on destroying your reputation? What kind of prayer is this to restrain Finance Minister from using capital reserves of RBI.

Now what is happening is that because of this, when you come with a good case also, we dont entertain you, said Gogoi J.

This is not the first time that the apex court has berated Sharma, earlier in 2015, then Chief Justice of India R.M. Lodha had imposed costs of Rs. 25,000 and Rs. 50,000 on him on two separate occasions.

JusticeD.Y. Chandrachud had also rapped Sharma for filing a PIL with unfounded claims against Union Ministers including the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister in relation to the Nirav Modi scam.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-to-consider-plea-against-invite-to-banu-mushtaq-to-inaugurate-mysuru-dasara-festival
Trending Judiciary
SC to consider plea against invite to Banu Mushtaq to inaugurate Mysuru Dasara festival

SC to hear plea challenging invite to Booker winner Banu Mushtaq as chief guest for Mysuru Dasara, citing religious rights and traditions.

18 September, 2025 01:20 PM
karta-of-huf-can-sell-joint-family-property-as-per-legal-necessity-sc
Trending Judiciary
'Karta' of HUF can sell joint family property as per legal necessity: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: ‘Karta’ of Hindu Undivided Family can sell joint family property for legal necessity, ruling depends on facts of each case.

18 September, 2025 01:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-asks-why-anti-pollution-measures-firecrackers-ban-for-delhi-alone
Trending Judiciary
SC asks why anti pollution measures, firecrackers ban for Delhi alone

SC questions why firecracker bans, anti-pollution steps apply only to Delhi; stresses need for uniform clean air policy across India.

13 September, 2025 10:43 AM
delhi-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-of-abhishek-bachchans-personality-rights
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Restrains Unauthorised Use Of Abhishek Bachchan’s Personality Rights [Read Order]

Delhi HC restrains misuse of Abhishek Bachchan’s personality rights, orders removal of unauthorized content, citing dignity & economic harm.

13 September, 2025 12:42 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-cbfc-ban-on-film-masoom-kaatil-for-promoting-vigilantism-communal-disharmony
Trending CelebStreet
Delhi HC Upholds CBFC Ban on Film ‘Masoom Kaatil’ for Promoting Vigilantism, Communal Disharmony [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds CBFC’s refusal to certify ‘Masoom Kaatil’, citing vigilantism, communal disharmony, gore and risk to social harmony.

13 September, 2025 01:02 PM
grandchild-cannot-claim-share-in-grandparents-property-if-parents-are-alive-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Grandchild Cannot Claim Share In Grandparents Property If Parents Are Alive: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Grandchildren have no automatic right to grandparents’ property if parents are alive: Delhi HC clears misconception

15 September, 2025 10:34 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email