38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC rejects plea for permission to conduct 'Urs' festival at a demolished dargah in Gir Somnat

By Jhanak Sharma      01 February, 2025 11:36 AM      0 Comments
SC rejects plea for permission to conduct Urs festival at a demolished dargah in Gir Somnat

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a plea for permission to conduct 'Urs' festival from February 1-3, at a demolished dargah in Gir Somnath district, Gujarat.

SC Denies Permission for ‘Urs’ Festival at Demolished Dargah in Gir Somnath

A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih declined to entertain the application, without considering the main matter.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Gujarat authorities submitted that no activities, including Hindu religious rituals, were being permitted on the land which was earlier under encroachment.

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Religious Gatherings at Encroached Site in Gujarat

However, the counsel, appearing for the applicant, said there was a dargah, which was demolished by the authorities.

He said that the tradition of conducting the 'Urs' festival at the dargah has been going on for the past so many years. The counsel submitted that the authorities had on Thursday denied permission for it and requested the court to permit gatherings of at least 20 people.

He argued that there is a government notification that it is a protected monument, and pointed the structure was on the list of protected monuments.

The bench said the authorities have demolished two temples.

Referring to a response from the Department of Archaeology, Mehta contended that the department had said that prior to this demolition in 2023, they conducted a survey and the department did not find any archaeological monument and there are detailed proceedings, one year back.

“You should not permit any religious function, even Hindus,” the bench told Mehta, who replied that there is Somnath Trust and even this did not get permission from authorities.

The bench asked the applicant’s counsel, “In contempt plea, how are you seeking this relief?”

Mehta said in 1951, this land was allotted by Sardar Patel to Somnath Trust, and some passerby is filing a contempt and he is not the main petitioner, pending before the apex court.

“Across religion, whatever was unauthorised was demolished. In Phase I of the removal on October 8, 2023, 26 encroachments were removed, out of which one encroacher belonged to the Hindu community. In Phase II, January 27, 2024, 174 encroachments, including temples all belonging to members of the Hindu community were removed," he submitted.

He also submitted that in Phase III, on January 27 and January 28, 2024, 155 encroachments on public roads were removed from a village, out of which 147 encroachments belonged to members of the Hindu community and 8 encroachments belonged to the Muslim community.

“In Phase IV, 40 encroachments, all belonging to the members of the Hindu community were removed…..Phase V cleared 102 acres of government land of encroachments,” he said.

He said that the contempt was filed against the backdrop of the court’s order that demolition should not occur without procedure, but the court had made it clear that any encroachment on public place or government land cannot be shielded.

“This indisputably is government land," he said.

He pointed out, they moved a contempt plea before the courts, lower court and the high court, which was rejected.
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM

TOP STORIES

regulating-hate-restricting-speech-an-analysis-of-the-karnataka-hate-speech-and-hate-crimes-bill-2025
Trending Executive
Regulating Hate, Restricting Speech ? An Analysis Of The Karnataka Hate Speech And Hate Crimes Bill, 2025

Analysis of Karnataka’s Hate Speech Bill, 2025, examining vague definitions, harsh penalties, executive powers, and its impact on free speech.

04 January, 2026 12:48 AM
if-memorial-for-stan-swamy-permitted-on-private-land-no-bar-for-stupa-commemorating-victory-over-colonial-forces-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
If Memorial for Stan Swamy Permitted on Private Land, No Bar for Stupa Commemorating Victory Over Colonial Forces: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court held that no government permission is needed to erect a memorial stupa on private patta land, citing the Stan Swamy memorial precedent.

05 January, 2026 05:35 PM
sc-denies-bail-to-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-2020-delhi-riots-conspiracy-case-grants-bail-to-five-others
Trending Judiciary
SC Denies Bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case; Grants Bail to Five Others

Supreme Court denies bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case, while granting bail to five co-accused.

05 January, 2026 05:55 PM
allahabad-hc-holds-commercial-division-of-high-court-as-proper-forum-for-enforcement-of-domestic-awards-in-international-commercial-arbitration
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC holds Commercial Division of High Court as proper forum for enforcement of domestic awards in international commercial arbitration [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that domestic arbitral awards in international commercial arbitration seated in India must be enforced before the High Court’s Commercial Division.

05 January, 2026 06:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email