38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, September 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC rejects plea to direct SBI reveal details of EBs prior to April 12, 2019

By Jhanak Sharma      18 March, 2024 03:05 PM      0 Comments
SC rejects plea to direct SBI reveal details of EBs prior to April 12 2019

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a plea for disclosure of details of Electoral Bonds purchased prior to interim order of April 12, 2019, saying it would amount to review of its February 15, 2024 judgement.

The court, however, directed the bank to disclose all details, including alfa numeric numbers, to the Election Commission for publishing it on website.

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud noted that the SBI was required to submit all details in terms of the purchase and of the receipt. The expression, "including" clearly demonstrated that the inclusive part was illustrative and not exhaustive, the court clarified.

Also Read -  SC asks SBI why it didn't furnish unique numbers on EBs

Pulling up the SBI, the bench said, "SBI's attitude seems to be "You tell us what to disclose, we will disclose". That does not seem to be fair. When we say "all details", it includes all conceivable data. We want all information related to the electoral bonds to be disclosed which is in your possession."

The bench, also comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna, B R Gavai, J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, asked the SBI chairman and managing director to file an affidavit by 5 PM on Thursday that it has disclosed all details related to Electoral Bonds.

Salve agreed to provide all details.

"We will give the bond numbers. The judgement was for transparency and the right to know for the citizens. If there are PILs saying investigate this and that, I don't think that is the intent of this court's judgment," Salve said.

"We will every bit of information. SBI is not holding back any information," he said.

The court, however, declined to consider a plea related to disclosure of all bonds issued since launch of the scheme in 2018, before its interim order on April 12, 2019.

"In our judgment, we have taken a conscious decision that the cut-off date should be date of interim order. We took that date because it was our considered view that once that interim order was pronounced, everybody was put on notice," the bench said.

The court also declined to entertain a plea by advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO Association for Democratic Reforms that major political parties in their details furnished to the Election Commission in terms of interim orders, did not disclose the name of donors though some smaller parties had done so.

The bench, however, said, "If we go back to earlier date (before interim order in 2019), it will become review of the judgment."

"We don't want to expand remit of the judgment," the bench said.

During the hearing, the court declined to consider submission by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi on behalf of the industry bodies like FICCI and ASSOCHAM, saying the plea has not been listed.

Also Read -  SBI Provides Electoral Bonds Data to Election Commission in Digital Format

Appearing for the Centre, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta sought to mention "witch hunting of political parties and twisting of the information" in social media as even those before the court have started giving press interviews to embarrass the court.

The bench, however, said, "Our shoulders are broad enough to deal with social media. We are governed by the Rule of Law...our intent was for disclosure only."

The apex court's judgment declaring Electoral Bonds as unconstitutional and disclosure of all information has triggered a barrage of allegations and counter allegations against the ruling BJP party of quid pro quo and misuse of investigating agencies like the CBI and ED to "extort" money from the corporate houses, even though all opposition parties like Congress, TMC, DMK and BRS received the substantial donations.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

delhi-itat-clears-37-cr-demonetization-cash-deposits-of-jeweller-dismisses-revenues-appeal
Trending Executive
Delhi ITAT Clears ₹3.7 Cr Demonetization Cash Deposits of Jeweller, Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal [Read Order]

Delhi ITAT upholds jeweller’s ₹3.7 cr demonetization cash deposits, ruling them genuine sales; dismisses Revenue’s appeal under Sec 68.

05 September, 2025 11:45 AM
delhi-hc-grants-injunction-to-astrologer-trishla-chaturvedi-orders-removal-of-defamatory-videos-against-trishla-maa
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Injunction to Astrologer Trishla Chaturvedi, Orders Removal of Defamatory Videos Against ‘Trishla Maa’ [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants injunction to astrologer Trishla Chaturvedi, orders removal of defamatory videos and restrains further posts against her.

05 September, 2025 12:02 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-approves-ecs-move-to-accept-claims-or-objections-to-draft-electoral-rolls-beyond-sep-1
Trending Judiciary
SC approves EC's move to accept claims or objections to draft electoral rolls beyond Sep 1

SC allows EC to accept claims and objections to Bihar draft electoral rolls even after Sept 1 deadline, till last date of nominations.

01 September, 2025 02:54 PM
sc-declines-to-entertain-pil-against-20-per-cent-ethanol-blended-petrol-e20-fuel
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to entertain PIL against 20 per cent ethanol-blended petrol, E20 fuel

SC declines PIL against Centre’s E20 fuel rollout, upholding ethanol-blended petrol policy despite concerns on efficiency and vehicle damage.

01 September, 2025 03:01 PM
sc-notice-on-tns-plea-against-hcs-judgment-on-implementation-of-rte-act
Trending Judiciary
SC notice on TN's plea against HC's judgment on implementation of RTE Act

SC issues notice on Tamil Nadu plea against Madras HC order making state solely liable for RTE Act funding, seeks Centre’s response.

01 September, 2025 04:35 PM
sc-upholds-telanganas-4-year-residence-rule-to-avail-domicile-quota-in-medical-admissions
Trending Judiciary
SC upholds Telangana's 4-year residence rule to avail domicile quota in medical admissions [Read Judgment]

SC upholds Telangana’s rule requiring 4 years of study in the state for availing domicile quota in MBBS and BDS admissions.

01 September, 2025 06:02 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email