38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Rejects Plea, Upholds ₹3,500 AIBE Exam Fee by BCI as Not Unconstitutional

By Jhanak Sharma      03 September, 2025 11:16 AM      0 Comments
SC Rejects Plea Upholds 3500 AIBE Exam Fee by BCI as Not Unconstitutional

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed a plea questioning Rs 3,500 fee charged by the Bar Council of India for conducting the All India Bar Examination, saying that the fee was not at all "unconstitutional."

A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and Sandeep Mehta observed that the BCI incurred huge expenses for conducting the examination and charging the fee was not violative of any provisions of the Constitution.

While dismissing the plea, the court asked petitioner Sanyam Gandhi, as to why he did not first approach the BCI in this regard.

The bench also concurred with the BCI's submission that the judgment in Gaurav Kumar Vs Union of India, which held that Bar Councils cannot charge more than the statutorily prescribed Rs 750 for enrolment, would not apply to the AIBE fees.

The court had previously issued notice to the BCI on a plea filed by advocate Gandhi.

The petitioner challenged the BCI’s fee structure, on the ground that general and OBC candidates were being charged Rs 3,500 along with additional incidental costs, while SC/ST candidates were charged Rs 2,500 along with incidental costs. "The fee charged by the BCI is illegal, unconstitutional amd arbitrary," Gandhi contended.

The petitioner contended, the fee system was in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, which ensured the right to equality, and to practice profession. He also claimed that it was contrary to Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act, 1961.

"The fee violated Sections 24 of the Advocates Act, 1961 as well as Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution," his plea claimed.

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-upholds-eds-provisional-attachment-orders-in-international-cricket-betting-racket
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds ED’s Provisional Attachment Orders in International Cricket Betting Racket [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds ED’s provisional attachment orders in a major international cricket betting and hawala case, dismissing all petitions under PMLA.

25 November, 2025 01:03 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-different-retirement-ages-for-coast-guard-officers
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Different Retirement Ages for Coast Guard Officers [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds different retirement ages for Coast Guard officers, ruling the distinction lawful and not comparable to CAPFs’ uniform superannuation age.

25 November, 2025 01:21 PM
sc-holds-defective-affidavit-in-ibc-is-curable-not-fatal-to-petition
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Defective Affidavit In IBC Is Curable, Not Fatal To Petition [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that a defective affidavit in a Section 7 IBC application is a curable irregularity, not grounds for rejection, and stresses mandatory notice requirements.

25 November, 2025 01:46 PM
police-cannot-label-sc-st-complaints-as-civil-disputes-fir-must-be-registered-immediately-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Label SC/ST Complaints as ‘Civil Disputes’, FIR Must Be Registered Immediately: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules police cannot treat SC/ST complaints as civil disputes and must register FIRs immediately under Section 18-A without preliminary enquiry.

25 November, 2025 01:58 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email