38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Seeks Centre’s Response on Plea to Recognize Haemophilia as Disability under RPwD Act, 2016 [Read Order]

By Samriddhi Ojha      11 November, 2025 02:16 PM      0 Comments
SC Seeks Centres Response on Plea to Recognize Haemophilia as Disability under RPwD Act 2016

New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India has issued notice on a petition filed by Haemophilia Federation (India) seeking inclusion of haemophilia within the scope of disabilities recognized under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (“RPwD Act”).

The petition, registered as Writ Petition (Civil) Diary No. 47246/2025, was heard by a Bench comprising Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice N.V. Anjaria on November 10, 2025.

The Bench was hearing the plea filed by Haemophilia Federation (India) and another petitioner through Senior Advocate Ms. Madhavi Divan, assisted by Advocate-on-Record Mr. Vikas Mehta along with Mr. Apoorv Khator, Mr. Gokul Holani, Ms. Arpita Pande, Mr. Ravi Holani, Mr. Shriram Kashyap, Ms. Shambhavi, Ms. Isha Shrivastava, Ms. Nidhi, and Mr. Pramarth Gupta, Advocates.

The petitioners have challenged the exclusion of persons with haemophilia from the list of recognized disabilities under the RPwD Act, contending that the omission violates the guarantee of equality and non-discrimination under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. It was submitted that haemophilia, being a lifelong blood disorder causing prolonged bleeding and functional impairments, ought to be classified as a disability to ensure affected persons receive equal access to employment, education, and healthcare.

During the brief hearing, the Court condoned the delay in refiling, heard the submissions, and issued notice to the Union of India, directing that the matter be tagged with W.P.(C) No. 619/2025, which raises a similar issue concerning the disability rights of haemophilia patients.

This development follows earlier judicial interventions on the matter. In September 2025, a Bench led by Justice B.R. Gavai had asked the Centre to clarify “why persons with haemophilia are excluded from the PwD quota in UPSC examinations,” observing that exclusion of a chronic, debilitating condition from the list of disabilities warranted judicial scrutiny.

Similarly, the Rajasthan High Court in Rajasthan State Haemophilia Welfare Society v. Union of India (2022 SCC OnLine Raj 1973) upheld the constitutionality of Section 34 of the RPwD Act while urging the State and Centre to adopt an inclusive interpretation of the statute to cover disorders like haemophilia within its beneficial ambit.

Case Title: Haemophilia Federation (India) & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

Case No.: Writ Petition (Civil)

Diary No. 47246/2025

Coram: Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice N.V. Anjaria
Date of Order: November 10, 2025

For Petitioners: Ms. Madhavi Divan, Senior Advocate; Mr. Vikas Mehta, AOR, assisted by Mr. Apoorv Khator, Mr. Gokul Holani, Ms. Arpita Pande, Ms. Isha Shrivastava, and Ms. Shambhavi, Advocates

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Samriddhi is a legal scholar currently pursuing her LL.M. in Constitutional Law at the National Law ...Read more



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email