38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC sets aside order to pay Rs 5 lakh to man for wrongful confinement in NDPS case [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      04 March, 2025 06:13 PM      0 Comments
SC sets aside order to pay Rs 5 lakh to man for wrongful confinement in NDPS case

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said bail jurisdiction under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code can't be used by the High Court to grant compensation to a man for wrongful confinement.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Manmohan emphasised that this court has time and again held that the sphere of consideration, when exercising power under this Section pertains only to securing or restricting liberty of the person in question.

The apex court set aside the Allahabad High Court's May 22, 2024 order, which told the Director, Narcotics Control Bureau to pay Rs 5,00,000 to a young person who had been wrongfully confined for four months despite the initial laboratory findings, stating the sample of seized material was negative of any banned substance under the NDPS Act.

"The undue restriction of liberty, i.e., without the backing of procedures established by law is unquestionably an affront to a person’s rights but the avenues to seek recourse of law in connection therewith are limited to remedies as per law," the bench said.

The court said grant of compensation is permissible but it has done so in the context of violation of fundamental rights. However, here no such remedy was availed, it said.

Also Read: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court rules Section 27 statements insufficient to prove knowledge in NDPS cases [Read Order]

Respondent Man Singh Verma was arrested upon seizure of 1280 grams of brown powder, alleged to be heroin, leading to registration of an FIR on January 6, 2023.

In the case, the court said, even the second laboratory test also found that there was no banned substance in the seized material. The district court Barabanki, which initially denied him bail, ordered his release on April 10, 2023 upon filing of the closure report by the NCB.

In its arguments, the Union government said even though the accused was released from jail, the High Court went on to examine the matter and ordered the compensation, going beyond its jurisdiction. It also said the NCB officers were protected under Section 69 of the NDPS Act for the acts done in good faith.

Also Read: Gauhati High Court grants bail to accused in NDPS case due to prolonged incarceration [Read Order]

Amicus Curiae, however, said re-testing of the second sample was impermissible and illegal and it led to an unjustified extension of the respondent’s custody. He said compensatory relief allowed for violation of fundamental rights should be extended to the bail jurisdiction.

After considering the matter, the bench, in its judgment on February 28, 2025, said, "Time and again, the act of courts overstepping the bounds of jurisdiction, has clearly been frowned upon. The instant case is another such example."

The court also found the application for bail filed before the High Court became infructuous after release of the respondent by the district court.

"The straightforward course of action that ought to have been adopted, was that the bail application would have been dismissed as such," the bench said.

Also Read: Filing of chargesheet not a ground for bail in NDPS cases: Tripura High Court [Read Order]

It said no occasion arose for the court to pass an order delving into the aspects of impermissibility of retesting the sample or wrongful confinement.

"Not only was the same outside the bounds, but it is erroneous on a further count that since the application was infructuous, the exercise of jurisdiction was entirely unjustified and contrary to law," the bench said.

The bench also pointed out, "It is a settled principle of law that the jurisdiction conferred upon a court under Section 439 CrPC is limited to grant or refusal of bail pending trial."

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email