38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 28, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC slams Assam govt for not deporting foreigners

By Harshvardhan Sharma      04 February, 2025 04:51 PM      0 Comments
SC slams Assam govt for not deporting foreigners

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday slammed the Assam government over its failure to deport foreigners after they were declared as illegal immigrants.

The court sought to know the reasons for the government on dragging its feet.

SC Criticizes Assam Govt Over Delayed Deportation of Illegal Immigrants

"You can’t continue to detain them indefinitely. Once they are held to be foreigners, they should be deported immediately. You know their citizenship status. Then how can you wait till their address is received? It is for the other country to decide where they should go," a bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan told the state government.

The court directed the Assam government to initiate the process to deport 63 persons, who are detained as foreigners, to their native country.

Supreme Court Orders Immediate Deportation of Foreigners in Assam

"Are you waiting for some muhurat," the bench asked the state government over the issue of deportation those detained as foreigners.

The court observed even without an address, the state can deport them.

The court was hearing a plea by Rajubala in connection with the issue of deportation of foreigners.

The bench said those people can be deported to the capital city of the country. "Suppose the person is from Pakistan and you know the capital city of Pakistan? So you send him or her to the capital city of Pakistan," the bench said.

"How can you keep them detained here, saying their foreign address is not known? Why have you not mentioned the date on which the verification was sent to the MEA," the bench asked the state government.

As the state counsel sought some time to file a proper affidavit in the matter, the bench told him, "We will issue a perjury notice to you (Assam government). As a State government, you are supposed to come clean."

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said that he would sit with the officials of the Ministry of External Affairs and find a solution, since the issue was not a State subject.

The Chief Secretary of Assam was present for the hearing virtually in the case.

The court gave the central government a month's time to clarify how to handle stateless individuals.

It also ordered the Assam government to ensure better conditions in detention centres, forming a committee to inspect facilities fortnightly, and fixed the matter for further hearing to February 25.

"We direct the State of Assam to file a proper affidavit reporting compliance with this order. If the State government finds that nationality verification forms have been sent two months back, the State will immediately issue a reminder to MEA. As soon as such reminder is received by the MEA, effective action shall be taken by the Ministry on the basis of nationality status verification," the court said in the order.

The court noted there are two categories of foreigners, one category is where the persons are declared not Indian nationals but their nationality is known, and the other category is where the tribunal has declared that the persons are not Indian nationals and their nationality is not known.

“As far as the first category is concerned it poses no difficulty, as far as their deportation is concerned. Regarding the second category, the Centre will have to tell the court in what manner their cases should be dealt with. We grant time of one month to the Union of India to file an affidavit dealing with this issue," the bench said.

The Union of India will also place on record the details of declared persons who are not Indian nationals and details of the persons who have been so far deported. Details about the manner of deportation shall also be stated and the figures should also be disclosed, the bench added.
 



Share this article:

About:

Advocate Harshvardhan Sharma, founder and Editor-in-Chief of LawStreet Journal, is an award-winning ...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

section-377-ipc-not-applicable-to-consensual-sexual-acts-between-husband-and-wife-during-marriage-mp-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Section 377 IPC Not Applicable to Consensual Sexual Acts Between Husband and Wife During Marriage: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court holds Section 377 IPC not applicable to sexual acts between husband and wife, partly quashing FIR in dowry and abuse case.

27 March, 2026 03:44 PM
mention-of-quantity-type-in-arrest-notice-sufficient-under-bnss-exact-quantity-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Mention of Quantity Type in Arrest Notice Sufficient Under BNSS, Exact Quantity Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala HC rules that mentioning nature of contraband quantity in arrest notice is sufficient under BNSS; exact quantity need not be specified.

27 March, 2026 04:07 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email