38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC states that Repetitive Filing of Applications Amounts to Abuse of Process of Law, Slaps Rs. 25K Costs on Adarsh Scam Accused

By ROCKY DAS      18 September, 2020 08:21 PM      0 Comments
SC states that Repetitive Filing of Applications Amounts to Abuse of Process of Law, Slaps Rs. 25K Costs on Adarsh Scam Accused

Raj Kumar Modi, an accused in the Adarsh Scam Case has been fine imposed of Rs. 25000 by the Honble Supreme Court for repetitive interim bail applications. Modi was granted bail by the Court on 15.06.2020 for two months in respect of his mother being seriously ill. Thereafter he filed another application for bail extension for the next 6months suggesting his mother being passed away and he has to perform some rituals.

He submitted another bail extension application claiming his wife is suffering from serious ailments. This was disposed for another one month and it was clearly mentioned no such bail extension will be entertained hence after. Thereafter the accused filed another application for interim bail extension on the ground of his own serious medical issue. 

However, observing such repetitive filing, a bench consisting of Justice L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta, and S. Ravindra Bhat dismissed the application noting that repetitive filing of an application for bail extension is abuse and mockery of Law and it shall not be entertained on any ground of aspects. The bench further stated that it was previously ordered by the Court that no bail extension would be granted and despite such order, the repetitive filing of applications by the accused suggests dismiss of the application at an exemplary cost.

Therefore, the accused has been imposed with Rs 25000 for such an act. The court further ordered to take necessary measures to provide adequate medical attention to the accused.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email