38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 24, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC stays criminal proceedings against Karnataka CM, others for 2022 demonstration [Read SC Order]

By Jhanak Sharma      19 February, 2024 01:59 PM      0 Comments
SC stays criminal proceedings against Karnataka CM others for demonstration

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed criminal proceedings initiated against Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and others for a protest march organised on February 14, 2022 in Bengaluru.

A bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and Prashant Kumar Mishra, however, orally observed all the demonstrations, which created disturbances on the road, can't be quashed just because politicians were involved into it.

The court issued notice to the Karnataka government on a plea filed by the Chief Minister, Minister M B Patil and others  Ramalingareddy and Congress leader Randeep Singh Surjewala.

Arguing for the petitioners, senior advocates Kapil Sibal, A M Singhvi and Sidharth Luthra claimed no ingredients of the offences alleged were made out in the matter.

They contended in a democracy, the right to freedom of speech and protest is paramount. 

They said the right to assemble and protest can be restricted only when public order is impacted and not the law and order.

The counsel also said the fundamental right can't be denied on the ground of law and order.

"Political protest against the ruling dispensation conducted peacefully without any criminal intent can't be muzzled," they said.

The court sought a response from the state government within six weeks. It stayed the Karnataka High Court's order of February 6, 2024 declining to quash the proceedings in the matter with Rs 10,000 cost.

In his arguments, Singhvi cited a number of past cases involving politicians like Prakash Karat, Senthil Balaji, Nishikant Dubey and others which were quashed by the High Courts.

The bench, however, said, "Your argument is if the protest is done by politicians, it has to be quashed."

"Did you seek permission before demonstration? You can't claim one fine morning, that since you are a politician, you should be allowed to obstruct the traffic," the bench said.

The court, at that point, told the counsel that the petitioners should go and face the trial.

However, after the counsel submitted holding the demonstration per se can't be considered as a criminal act, the court decided to examine the matter.

The Bengaluru police lodged the FIR and subsequently filed a charge sheet for the protest march organised to demand resignation of then Minister K S Eshwarappa following death of a civil contractor alleging demand of commission in the previous BJP government.

 

[Read SC Order]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

supreme-courts-diwali-decision-sparks-debate-crackers-faith-and-fairness-bolo-bharat
Trending Videos
Supreme Court’s Diwali Decision Sparks Debate | Crackers, Faith & Fairness | Bolo Bharat

As Diwali approaches, the debate reignites over the Supreme Court’s decision permitting the use of green crackers. Is this a balanced step toward sustainable celebration, or does it reflect a tilt toward community sentiment?

18 October, 2025 08:20 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email