38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, October 07, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC tells HCs, trial courts to decide anticipatory, regular bail within 2 months [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      15 September, 2025 03:48 PM      0 Comments
SC tells HCs trial courts to decide anticipatory regular bail within 2 months

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has directed all the State High Courts and trial courts across the country to take up bail pleas within a short time frame, preferably within two months.

A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan, said the High Courts shall ensure that applications for bail and anticipatory bail pending before them or before the subordinate courts under their jurisdiction are disposed of expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing, except in cases where delay is attributable to the parties themselves.

The court's direction came on an appeal filed by the appellant, Anna Waman Bhalerao and another against a Bombay High Court order dismissing his anticipatory bail in a cheating and forgery case.

The court noted the matter of bail was kept pending before the High Court for several years, though interim protection was granted to the accused.

It directed the High Courts to come up with mechanism to avoid accumulation of pending bail and anticipatory bail applications, emphasising the applications concerning personal liberty cannot be kept pending for years, as the accused continue to remain under a cloud of uncertainty.

The apex court remarked prolonged delay -- in disposing of regular and anticipatory bail pleas -- not only frustrates the object of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) but also amounts to a denial of justice.

The bench issued a slew of directions, saying regular and anticipatory bail applications must be decided expeditiously on merits without relegating the parties to a state of indefinite pendency.

The court passed the following directions in this regard.

  1. HCs shall ensure that applications for bail and anticipatory bail pending before them or before the subordinate courts under their jurisdiction are disposed of expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing, except in cases where de attributable to the parties themselves.
  2. HCs shall issue necessary administrative directions to subordinate courts to prioritise matters involving personal liberty and to avoid indefinite adjournments.
  3. Investigating agencies are expected to conclude investigations in long pending cases with promptitude so that neither the complainant nor the accused suffers prejudice on account of undue delay.
  4. Being the highest constitutional fora in the States, High Courts must devise suitable mechanisms and procedures to avoid accumulation of pending bail / anticipatory bail applications and ensure that the liberty of citizens is not left in abeyance. In particular, bail and anticipatory bail applications shall not be kept pending for long durations without passing orders either way, as such pendency directly impinges upon the fundamental right to liberty.

The court stated, being the highest constitutional fora in the States, HCs must ensure that the liberty of citizens is not left in abeyance. In particular, bail and anticipatory bail applications shall not be kept pending for long durations without passing orders either way, as such pendency directly impinges upon the fundamental right to liberty.

The court directed the Registrar (Judicial) to circulate a copy of this judgment to all High Courts for immediate compliance and prompt administrative action.

[Read Judgment]

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM

TOP STORIES

patna-hc-quashes-fir-against-energy-drink-seller-rules-trace-alcohol-within-bis-limits
Trending Judiciary
Patna HC Quashes FIR Against Energy Drink Seller, Rules Trace Alcohol Within BIS Limits [Read Judgment]

Patna HC quashes FIR against energy drink seller, rules products with less than 0.5% alcohol meet BIS standards and don’t violate Bihar prohibition laws.

01 October, 2025 06:47 PM
tn-files-review-plea-against-sc-judgment-mandating-tet-for-in-service-teachers
Trending Judiciary
TN files review plea against SC judgment mandating TET for in service teachers

TN moves SC with review plea against mandatory TET rule, citing risk of mass teacher disqualification and disruption of children’s right to education.

01 October, 2025 11:30 PM
allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email