38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, February 18, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC to examine plea against withdrawal of sanction to CBI probe into illegal assets by Ktka Dy CM D K Shivakumar

By Jhanak Sharma      18 September, 2024 11:55 AM      0 Comments
SC to examine plea against withdrawal of sanction to CBI probe into illegal assets by Ktka Dy CM D K Shivakumar

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday decided to examine validity of the Karnataka government's decision withdrawing sanction for the CBI to probe disproportionate assets allegedly acquired by Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan issued notice to the Karnataka government and Shivakumar on a plea filed by Karnataka BJP MLA Basanagouda Patil Yatnal.

The petitioner was aggrieved with the Karnataka High Court's order of August 29, 2024 dismissing his plea.

During the hearing, the bench sought to know if Article 131 of the Constitution for filing appeal before the Supreme Court would be invoked here as it was something between the State and the State (CBI).

Senior advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for Shivakumar, defended the High Court's judgment saying that it was right, since all the investigation was between Centre (CBI) and the State. He also contended the aggrieved person here should be CBI, the consent from whom was withdrawn.

"You may be right. The High Court could have said that CBI is aggrieved party and not the other one," the bench said.

Senior advocate Siddharth Dave, appearing for Patil, said the High Court's judgment did not contain even a whisper about his locus.

The court, however, decided to examine the matter, allowing the state government and Shivakumar to raise preliminary objections.

On August 29, the Karnataka High Court dismissed petitions filed by Yatnal and the CBI challenging the Congress government’s decision to withdraw consent for investigating a corruption case against Shivakumar.

The court had termed the petitions as “non-maintainable”.

The High Court also dismissed the CBI’s challenge to the state’s November 28, 2023, decision to withdraw consent for probing Shivakumar’s alleged illegal assets.

A bench of Justices K Somashekhar and Umesh Adiga had dismissed the CBI challenge to the Congress government’s decision to withdraw consent to probe Shivakumar’s alleged illegal assets and a December 26, 2023, state order to refer the matter to the Karnataka Lokayukta for a probe. The BJP MLA’s similar plea was also dismissed.

Shivakumar's counsel had argued that the original September 25, 2019 order of the state government—during the BJP’s tenure —granting CBI sanction for investigation “reeks of malafide.”

The CBI filed a disproportionate assets case against Shivakumar on October 3, 2020, with the consent of the previous BJP government on September 25, 2019. This action was taken following a request by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to investigate corruption charges discovered during an Income Tax (I-T) Department probe.

The Congress government in Karnataka, which took over from the BJP in May 2023, revoked the consent given to the CBI in 2019 to investigate allegations of disproportionate assets against Shivakumar. This decision was made after a cabinet meeting on November 23, 2023. The Congress has indicated that the case was referred to the CBI in 2019 even before an FIR was filed in 2020.

The CBI alleged that Shivakumar accumulated Rs 74.93 crore of wealth disproportionate to known sources of income from April 2013 to April 2018, while serving as the energy minister in a previous Congress government.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

nobody-should-believe-anybody-before-marriage-sc-cautions-against-pre-marital-physical-relationships
Trending Judiciary
“Nobody Should Believe Anybody Before Marriage”: SC Cautions Against Pre-Marital Physical Relationships

Supreme Court cautions young adults on pre-marital relationships in a bail plea over rape on false promise of marriage; suggests mediation.

17 February, 2026 04:47 PM
allahabad-hc-refers-advocate-for-criminal-contempt-after-alleged-scandalous-remarks-during-bail-hearing
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refers Advocate for Criminal Contempt After Alleged Scandalous Remarks During Bail Hearing [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refers advocate for criminal contempt over alleged scandalous remarks during a bail hearing in Uttar Pradesh.

17 February, 2026 05:15 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-notifies-2026-guidelines-for-senior-advocate-designation-scraps-point-system-and-interviews
Trending Judiciary
SC Notifies 2026 Guidelines for Senior Advocate Designation; Scraps Point System and Interviews [Read Notification]

Supreme Court notifies 2026 guidelines for Senior Advocate designation, abolishing point system and interviews; introduces holistic evaluation process.

12 February, 2026 04:00 PM
sunjay-kapur-will-dispute-priya-sachdev-files-application-to-dismiss-mil-rani-kapurs-family-trust-fraud-allegations
Trending Judiciary
Sunjay Kapur Will Dispute: Priya Sachdev Files Application To Dismiss MIL Rani Kapur’s Family Trust Fraud Allegations

Delhi HC issues notice on Priya Kapur’s plea to dismiss Rani Kapur’s suit alleging a fraudulent family trust to divert late Sunjay Kapur’s estate.

12 February, 2026 04:32 PM
girlfriend-cannot-be-deemed-relative-of-husband-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Girlfriend Cannot Be Deemed ‘Relative’ of Husband: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes case against girlfriend, holds she is not a “relative” under Section 498A IPC and cannot be charged with stalking under Section 354D.

12 February, 2026 04:46 PM
allahabad-hc-stays-section-174-a-ipc-proceedings-against-mla-abbas-ansari
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Stays Section 174-A IPC Proceedings Against MLA Abbas Ansari [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court stayed proceedings against MLA Abbas Ansari under Section 174-A IPC over alleged non-compliance with proclamation proceedings.

12 February, 2026 05:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email