38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 20, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC to hear plea for stay on CAA Rules on March 19

By Jhanak Sharma      15 March, 2024 03:31 PM      0 Comments
SC to hear plea for stay on CAA Rules on March 19

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to examine on March 19 applications filed for staying the implementation of Citizenship Amendment Rules, 2024 notified on March 11, 2024.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra fixed the date of hearing on Tuesday as senior advocate Kapil Sibal mentioned the matter for urgent listing.

Also Read -  Modi govt officially notifies Citizenship Amendment Act rules ahead of Lok Sabha Polls

Appearing for applicant Kerala's Indian Union Muslim League, Sibal said the apex court had during the hearing on validity of the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019, did not stay the law on the ground that rules were yet not notified.

"However, just before elections, after four years of the passage of the Act, the government has notified the rules. In the circumstances, if the citizenship is granted, it would be impossible to reverse the process," he said.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for the Centre submitted he has no objection to the listing of the matter but the petitioners don't have locus to question the citizenship.

Kerala's Indian Union Muslim League and others filed a plea in the Supreme Court seeking a direction to stay the implementation of Citizenship Amendment Rules, 2024. The applicants claimed the CAA Rules violated Article 14 of the Constitution, besides being  unconstitutional, discriminatory, manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable and irrational.

Also Read -  IUML files plea in Supreme Court against CAA implementation

They asked the court stay the continued operation of CAA, 2019 and rules which would result into valuable rights being created and citizenship being granted to persons belonging to certain religions only, thereby resulting into fait accompli situation. 

The CAA proposed to give citizenship to those persons who are illegal migrants belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi or Christian community from Afghanistan, Bangladesh or Pakistan and, who have already entered into India on or before December 31, 2014. Over 250 petitions were filed before the court challenging validity of the CAA, 2019.

The applicants said since the CAA discriminates on the basis of religion, it strikes at the root of the concept of secularism, which is the basic structure of Constitution. 

Also Read -  CAA or Sixth Schedule of the Constitution in Meghalaya?
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

priests-who-have-travelled-abroad-cannot-enter-sanctum-sanctorum-andhra-pradesh-hc-orders-strict-compliance-with-2010-circular
Trending Judiciary
Priests Who Have Travelled Abroad Cannot Enter Sanctum Sanctorum: Andhra Pradesh HC Orders Strict Compliance with 2010 Circular [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court directs strict enforcement of 2010 circular barring priests who travelled abroad from entering sanctum sanctorum.

14 April, 2026 01:25 PM
advocate-challenges-punjab-and-haryana-high-courts-refusal-of-senior-designation-before-supreme-court-alleging-lack-of-transparency
Trending Judiciary
Advocate Challenges Punjab and Haryana High Court’s Refusal of Senior Designation Before Supreme Court, Alleging Lack of Transparency

Supreme Court to hear plea challenging Punjab & Haryana HC’s senior designation process, alleging lack of transparency, fairness, and procedural irregularities.

14 April, 2026 01:39 PM
delhi-hc-hears-arvind-kejriwals-recusal-plea-against-justice-swarana-kanta-sharma-in-excise-policy-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Hears Arvind Kejriwal’s Recusal Plea Against Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in Excise Policy Case

Delhi HC hears Arvind Kejriwal’s plea seeking recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in excise policy case, alleging apprehension of bias.

14 April, 2026 02:19 PM
delhi-hc-rules-in-favour-of-impressarios-social-restaurant-chain-in-trademark-dispute-orders-removal-of-social-house-mark
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Rules in Favour of Impressario’s ‘SOCIAL’ Restaurant Chain in Trademark Dispute, Orders Removal of ‘SOCIAL HOUSE’ Mark [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court orders removal of ‘SOCIAL HOUSE’ trademark for non-use, rules in favour of Impressario in major trademark dispute.

14 April, 2026 02:28 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email