38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC to Hear Various Pleas Challenging NEET-UG Exam Today

By Jhanak Sharma      08 July, 2024 10:23 AM      0 Comments
SC to Hear Various Pleas Challenging NEET UG Exam Today

The Supreme Court will hear various pleas challenging the NEET-UG exams on Monday.

A batch of petitions will be taken up by a bench consisting of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, along with Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra.

Approximately 38 petitions have been filed by various students. Some petitioners have sought to conduct the exams again, while others have requested inquiries related to malpractice and irregularities.

Countering the petition submissions, the National Testing Agency (NTA), which conducts NEET-UG, and the Centre filed an affidavit recently opposing the plea to conduct the medical examination again. NTA and the Centre argued that scrapping the NEET-UG 2024 exam would seriously jeopardize lakhs of honest candidates.

For admissions to MBBS, BDS, and other related undergraduate courses, NTA conducted an exam on May 5. However, the exam gained attention due to alleged paper leaks and inflated marking, leading to nationwide protests by various students after the results were declared on June 4.

Various students have approached the Supreme Court, raising serious concerns over the exam.

In an affidavit, the Union Government informed the Supreme Court that they are committed to ensuring the sanctity of NEET examinations and protecting the interests of students. They argued that scrapping the exam entirely would seriously jeopardize the lakhs of honest candidates who attempted the question paper in 2024.

The Centre, in its affidavit filed in the SC recently, submitted that in the absence of any proof of any large-scale breach of confidentiality in a pan-India examination, it would not be rational to scrap the entire examination and the results already declared. They further submitted that in any examination, there are competing rights, and the interests of a large number of students who have taken the examination without adopting any alleged unfair means must not be jeopardized.

It is respectfully submitted that the Government is committed to ensuring the sanctity of examinations and protecting the interest of students. To ensure transparency, fairness, and credibility in public examinations, Parliament enacted the Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act 2024 on 12.02.2024. The Act was brought into effect on 21.06.2024 and provides for stringent punishment for offences related to unfair means in public examinations. The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Rules, 2024, under the Act, were also notified on 23.06.2024, the Centre said in the affidavit.

The Centre also submitted that in the absence of any proof of any large-scale breach of confidentiality in a pan-India examination, it would not be rational to scrap the entire examination and the results already declared.

The Union Government emphasized that the interests of a large number of students who have taken the examination without adopting any alleged unfair means must not be jeopardized.

The affidavit apprised that the Ministry of Education has constituted a High-Level Committee of Experts to suggest effective measures for conducting transparent, smooth, and fair examinations by the National Testing Agency after the present examination. The Committee has started its deliberation, held four meetings, and begun consultation with stakeholders, especially students, and has sought suggestions and ideas online until July 7.

The Union of India stated that it is committed to conducting all competitive examinations in a fair and transparent manner. The Union of India duly appreciates that the confidentiality of the question papers is the utmost priority in any examination and that if the confidentiality has been breached due to some criminality at the behest of some criminal elements, those individuals must be dealt with sternly and with the full force of the law to ensure they are punished. The UOI also informed that the CBI is probing the irregularities in the exams.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email