38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, May 30, 2024
Judiciary

SC to take up PIL by Ashwini Upadhyay for publishing draft laws before hand to strengthen law making process

By Harshvardhan Sharma      27 October, 2022 05:59 PM      0 Comments
SC to take up PIL by Ashwini Upadhyay for publishing draft laws before hand to strengthen law making process

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court is set to take up on October 31 an important PIL by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay for a direction to the Centre and States to publish draft legislations 60 days before introducing those in Parliament and State Assemblies.

A bench of Chief Justice U U Lalit and Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Bela M Trivedi would take up the matter.

Upadhyay pleaded for putting draft in public domain prominently which would make professionals and others to discuss the proposed statutes strengthening the law making process.

He asked the court to ensure that the decisions taken in the meeting of the Committee of the Secretaries on January 10, 2014, under the Chairmanship of Cabinet Secretary on Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy were complied with in order to ensure wide public discussion and feedback.

"A rigorous public debate on the law for two months would force the Executive to analyse every aspect. When the law would be debated in the parliament, MLAs/MPs will give better suggestions as well. After all this, the new draft (if published in all regional languages) would encompass all suggestions received from all sections, thus it would be error-free and democratically viable," his plea stated.

It further claimed that this would eliminate the challenging of the law, as the court can ask the petitioner why he/she hadn't given his/her suggestion to the government. "Such a law-making process would be more effective and transparent. It would also strengthen democracy and reduce the load of PILs," the plea suggested.

The petitioner said the cause of action accrued on November 26, 2020, when farmer and labour unions protested against the three farm Acts. On November 30, 2020, farmers converged at various border points of Delhi and continued to protest.

"As the draft was not published for wide consultation and feedback, this has led to a lot of misinformation and protest among the farmers and political vultures are using this chaos to advance their own cause, using the farmers as a front," he claimed.

Upadhyay claimed in view of the recommendations of the National Advisory Council, the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution and comparative international practices, the Government of India had conceived of a Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy in 2014. It was then made mandatory for the Ministry or Department concerned to publish or place in the public domain the draft legislation or at least the information that may include a brief justification for such legislation, essential elements of proposed legislation, its broad financial implications.

He said the existing law making process is not only undemocratic but also unconstitutional.

"Secretaries of the respective departments draft the bill and cabinet approves it without wider public discussion and feedback. It is only after the Parliament/Assembly debate that the public is made aware of it. Moreover, many times, the government makes new laws even when amending the existing law would suffice. It not only exhausts the public resources but also is a complete waste of legislature's time," his plea said.

For example, conversion by the carrot and stick (deceitful conversion) is a national problem and adding just one sentence to Section 493 of the IPC can make the conversion by 'hook or crook' a serious offence all over India but States are making new law through ordinance. Similarly, removing a sentence from S. 494 can make polygamy a serious offence for all citizens but Centre is waiting for the apex Court's verdict.

Likewise, after the Supreme Court judgment, Triple Talaq is now void and unconstitutional and has no impact on a marriage.

Now, it has been rendered a mental cruelty which could have been done by adding a sentence to S. 498A, IPC.

"Law-making process needs drastic reforms. Any Draft Legislation, except those related to National Security, must be published on the government's website for at least 60 days before introduction in Parliament / State Legislature. People will come to know about the law through various platforms such as electronic print and social media. Experts would analyse it, professionals would debate it and people representatives will discuss in their constituencies. It will strengthen the concept of socialist secular democratic republic," the plea said.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Stop Dividing India On Minority-Majority Basis: BJP LEADER ASHWINI UPADHYAY Stop Dividing India On Minority-Majority Basis: BJP LEADER ASHWINI UPADHYAY

The Constitution of India is by the Indians and for the Indians. Globally, there are 6000 plus languages. Can we consider a Chinese or French-speaking person a linguistic minority? If yes, then India would end up having 60+ linguistic minorities. Linguistic minorities may be identified at the district level, and only Indian languages may be considered for protection under Articles 29-30, i.e. a Hindi speaking person is a linguistic minority in Kerala and Tamil speaking in Bihar. The same notion may follow for religious minorities too, and only India originated religions may be considered a religious minority

Ashwini Upadhyay Who Challenged Places of Worship Act Seeks Impleadment In Gyanvapi Dispute Before Supreme Court Ashwini Upadhyay Who Challenged Places of Worship Act Seeks Impleadment In Gyanvapi Dispute Before Supreme Court

The Supreme Court had on Friday heard the Special Leave Petition regarding the Gyanvapi issue and had ordered that Order 7 Rule 11 Application being tried in the subordinate court of Varanasi be sent to the District Judge, as the Court was of the opinion that a seasoned hand would be required to handle the matter.

Why Places of Worship Act 1991 Does Not Apply to Gyanvapi Matter Ashwini Upadhyay Gyanvapi Mosque Why Places of Worship Act 1991 Does Not Apply to Gyanvapi Matter Ashwini Upadhyay Gyanvapi Mosque

ज्ञानवापी पर एडवोकेट अश्विनी उपाध्याय की याचिका में दी गई दलीलों के बाद मुस्लिम पक्ष परेशान है। जिस कानूनी तथ्यों के आधार पर याचिका डाली गई है उसके बाद आज देश में इस याचिका को लेकर काफी चर्चा हो रही है क्या है याचिका में दलील देखिये रिपोर्ट।

SC to hear plea against validity of Places of Worship Act on Sep 9 SC to hear plea against validity of Places of Worship Act on Sep 9

The Supreme Court is likely to hear on September 9 a plea by BJP leader and advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay challenging validity of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, which mandated maintaining character of religious places as prevailed on August 15, 1947.

TRENDING NEWS

aap-minister-atishi-summoned-by-delhi-court-in-bjp-defamation-case-to-appear-on-jun-29
Trending Judiciary
AAP Minister Atishi summoned by Delhi Court in BJP defamation case, to appear on Jun 29

A Delhi Court has summoned Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Minister Atishi in a defamation case by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spokesperson Praveen Shankar Kapoor.

29 May, 2024 12:44 PM
sikkim-high-court-announces-menstrual-leave-for-female-employees
Trending Judiciary
Sikkim High Court Announces Menstrual Leave for Female Employees [Read Order]

Sikkim High Court grants 2-3 days of menstrual leave monthly to female employees, requiring Medical Officer approval, without deducting from regular leave accounts.

29 May, 2024 01:15 PM

TOP STORIES

live-coverage-in-depth-exploration-of-bhartiya-sakshya-adhiniyam-bsa-at-dhcba-lecture-series
Trending Events & Opportunity
LIVE Coverage: In-Depth Exploration of Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) at DHCBA Lecture Series [Watch Live]

LIVE Coverage: DHCBA Lecture Series explores the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 with Justice Bhambhani & Senior Advocate Jayant Mehta. Tune in at 5pm on LawStreet Journal!

24 May, 2024 11:30 AM
bjp-moves-supreme-court-against-calcutta-high-courts-ban-on-derogatory-ads-targeting-tmc
Trending Judiciary
BJP Moves Supreme Court Against Calcutta High Court's Ban on "Derogatory" Ads Targeting TMC

BJP moves Supreme Court against Calcutta High Court order banning "derogatory" ads targeting TMC during Lok Sabha elections, seeks urgent hearing.

24 May, 2024 12:12 PM
demand-notice-via-courier-valid-in-cheque-bounce-cases-allahabad-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Demand Notice via courier valid in cheque bounce cases: Allahabad High Court [Read Order]

Allahabad HC rules demand notices via courier valid for cheque bounce cases under Section 138 NI Act, but service presumption needs registered post amendment.

24 May, 2024 01:44 PM
cant-interrupt-in-between-polls-sc-declines-to-consider-plea-for-uploading-voters-turnout-data
Trending Judiciary
'Can't interrupt in between polls,' SC declines to consider plea for uploading voters turnout data

SC declines plea to upload voter turnout data during ongoing polls, citing the need to avoid interruptions and uphold electoral integrity, pending further examination.

24 May, 2024 02:06 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email