38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, May 21, 2024

SC seeks separate status report from UP govt on Lakhimpur killings

By LawStreet News Network      26 October, 2021 11:55 AM      0 Comments
SC UP govt Lakhimpur Kheri killings

SC seeks separate status report from UP govt on killing of journalist Kashyap and an accused Shyam Sundar in Lakhimpur killings.
Accused's widow Ruby says she had named three persons for husband's killing but police refusing to register any FIR till date

UP AAG Garima Prashad: We had circulated the status report

CJI: Why have you kept all accused except one in police custody. For what purpose

AAG: Statements are being recorded and some statements are yet to be recorded

AAG: after filing this report, seven more statements have been recorded under Section 164 CrPC

Sr Adv Harish Salve: There are some updated figures.

CJI: Come to para 3 first

Salve: Out of 68, 30 witnesses have been recorded under 164 CrPC. Of these 23 are eye witnesses. A lot of them are former witnesses etc

CJI: case is there were hundreds of farmers are in a rally. Only 23 people were there ?

Salve: we gave an advertisement. The people who saw the onea in car etc are already there. A large no of digital media has been recovered. There are overlapping videos.

Salve: There was also a person who was conducting videography of the event. These have to be sent to labs so that they can be taken as evidences.

Surya Kant J: You said there was 4,000 or 5,000 people. Mostly they were locals. Post incident most of them have been agitating for an inquiry. Accessibility and identification of such persons in the vehicle should not be a great issue

Salve: People have seen the car and people inside the car and people being killed

CJI: In such a case there is a possibility of....

Salve: if you approve we can show some 164 statements to you

CJI: if the eye witness is more credible than a bystander then it's best to have that first hand information

Salve: Can we show you in sealed cover which are the 164 statements. I have been told what kind of statements have been recorded.

Kant J: Let us not forget that some people in this crowd are just fence sitters. There will be only some who can stand and depose

CJI: Identification is important

Salve: all 16 accused have been identified

CJI: Are there any injured witness?

Salve: don't think so

CJI: Not a single injured witness, ok. We can direct the labs to expedite the delivery of the reports

Salve: I believe there are some injured witnesses and some of them are there in the recorded 164 statements. I will give a list

CJI: Another issue is witness protection and you asked them to apply for it

Salve: That ia a problem with the statement, they have already been provided with security.

CJI: That's okay, just provide them security like CCTV, Home guards...

CJI: We have seen the second statua report by UP. We have been apprised of different steps being taken and development in the case. However the concern is getting reports from FSL labs as early as possible.

CJI: Regarding witness protection we direct the witnesses to be provided protection by the state. We further direct that 164 statements and the relevant ones be recorded expeditiously.

CJI: If a judicial officer is not available, district judge can allocate a nearest magistrate can hear the 164 statements.

Sr Adv Arun Bhardwaj: I appear for Ruby Devi. My husband has been killed. I want justice. The killers are roaming free and threatening me

CJI: Mr Salve..

Salve: I will inform the police...

Salve: Shyam Sundar, the accused is the one here. Husband of Ruby Devi. This is being probed. The death of the journalists who was in the car was also killed.

CJI: you have to file separate replies Mr Salve

CJI: there are two complainants before me. One by Ruby Devi and one death of journalist. State is directed to file separate replies in the case

Bhardwaj: Kindly allow our statements to be recorded..

CJI: Yes

Salve: It will be done

Matter to be heard next on November 8, 2021

Court wants forensic labs to expedite process of submitting evidence in the case. Matter to be heard again on November 8. Court also expressed surprise that out of 4000~5000 odd gathering,  statement under 164 was recorded only of  20 eye witnesses

SALVE initially stated that there are no injured eye  witness as there were all fatalities. He later corrected himself saying the eye witnesses include 3-4 injured witnesses whose statements had been recorded under 164

Court also directed complete protection to all eye witnesses and preservation of material evidence in the case

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Cannot Allow the Game of Hide and Seek for Committing Murder of an Unborn Child: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court denies abortion for minor rape victim, condemns misuse of legal authority to terminate pregnancy and prevent justice.

20 May, 2024 03:52 PM
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Hit & Run: Bail Granted to 17 Year Old in Under 14 Hours, Asked to write essay

Bail granted to 17-year-old in Pune Porsche hit-and-run case within 14 hours. Conditions include educational tasks, supervision, and counseling. Incident killed two.

20 May, 2024 04:30 PM


Trending Judiciary
SC rebukes IMA chief; rejects apology for remarks

SC rebukes IMA chief R V Asokan; rejects his apology for remarks against the court in contempt proceedings involving Baba Ramdev and Patanjali's MD Acharya Balkrishna.

15 May, 2024 11:02 AM
Trending Judiciary
Can't allow parole for having procreation with live-in partner: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC denied parole for a convict seeking procreation with a live-in partner, stating it would set a harmful precedent, considering his legal marriage and children.

15 May, 2024 12:19 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC declares arrest of Newsclick's Editor-in-Chief Prabir Purkayastha as invalid

SC declares Newsclick Editor-in-chief Prabir Purkayastha's arrest invalid. He was detained in October 2023 under UAPA for alleged pro-China propaganda. SC orders release.

15 May, 2024 12:30 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to entertain plea for direction to EC to act against PM, BJP leaders

SC rejects plea seeking Election Commission action against PM and BJP leaders for alleged hate speeches during elections.

15 May, 2024 12:55 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email