38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 25, 2024
Breaking News
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Upholds the Validity of The Tribunal Rules 2020

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      27 November, 2020 04:41 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Upholds the Validity of The Tribunal Rules 2020

The Madras Bar Association by way of writ petition in the Supreme Court has challenged the rules formulated in February 2020 known as the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2020 (The Tribunal Rules 2020).

The petition stated that the Tribunal Rules 2020 should be struck down as it poses a threat to Articles 14 (right to equality of law) and 21 (right to life) for being arbitrary and unreasonable against the principles of Separation of powers and independence of judiciary, and is in contravention of previous decisions of the Supreme Court,particularly the one in Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd.

Earlier on 9th October, 2020, the bench when reserving the matter for judgment clarified that whenever the term of any Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson or members of the Tribunal is expiring, the same stands extended till December 12, 2020.

The division bench comprising Justices L Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta and S Ravindra Bhat, directed the Central Government to constitute a National Tribunal Commission for the appointment of members in various Tribunals.

The most significant directions given by the bench are following

  1. Till the constitution of the National Tribunals Commission, a separate wing should be established at the Ministry of Finance to cater to the requirements of tribunals.
  2. Advocates with experience of 10 years will be eligible for appointment as judicial members in tribunals. Members of Indian Legal Service will also be eligible for appointment as judicial members provided they fulfill the same criteria as advocates.
  3. The Chief Justice of India or his nominee will have a casting vote in the search committee. The committee will also comprise Secretary to Ministry of Law and Justice and Secretary to Government of India from a department other than the parent or sponsoring department nominated by the cabinet secretary. The secretary of the sponsoring department shall be member secretary without vote.
  4. In respect of Matters for disciplinary action, the recommendations made by the Search and Selection committee shall be final.
  5. Appointments to tribunals shall be made within 3 months from the date on which the process is complete and recommendations are made by the search committee.
  6. The 2020 Rules shall have prospective effect and will be applicable only from February 12, 2020.
  7. Appointments made prior to 2017 Rules and appointments made during pendency of Rojer Mathew judgment shall be governed by respective statutes.
  8. Chairpersons, Vice-Chairpersons, and members of tribunals appointed prior to February 12, 2020 shall be governed by parent statute and rules as per which they were appointed.
  9. 2020 Rules shall be applicable with the modifications laid down in the judgment to those who were appointed after February 12, 2020.


Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cheque-issued-for-bribe-payment-not-enforceable-under-ni-act-punjab-and-haryana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque issued for bribe payment not enforceable under NI Act: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that bribe payments do not constitute legally enforceable liabilities under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 October, 2024 10:56 AM
pune-porsche-accident-bombay-hc-rejects-anticipatory-bail-over-alleged-evidence-tampering-involving-3-lakh-bribe
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Accident: Bombay HC rejects anticipatory bail over alleged evidence tampering involving ₹3 lakh bribe [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rejects anticipatory bail in Pune Porsche accident case, citing serious evidence tampering and bribery allegations against the accused’s father.

24 October, 2024 11:07 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-plea-for-direction-to-set-up-regulatory-board-to-monitor-and-manage-ott-platforms
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for direction to set up regulatory board to monitor & manage OTT platforms

SC dismisses plea to set up a regulatory board for OTT platforms, stating the issue falls under policy matters, not for the court to intervene.

19 October, 2024 06:22 PM
a-judges-praise-of-politician-may-affect-publics-trust-in-judiciary-sc-judge-b-r-gavai
Trending Judiciary
A judge's praise of politician may affect public's trust in judiciary: SC judge B R Gavai

SC Judge B R Gavai cautions that judges praising politicians and resigning to contest elections may erode public trust and compromise judicial impartiality.

21 October, 2024 01:34 PM
complainant-cant-insist-on-deciding-plea-to-summon-other-accused-before-cross-examination-sc
Trending Judiciary
Complainant can't insist on deciding plea to summon other accused before cross examination: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules complainant can’t delay cross-examination to summon others as accused; trial court has discretion on timing under Section 319 CrPC.

21 October, 2024 01:36 PM
sc-dismisses-kejriwals-plea-against-summons-in-defamation-case-on-remarks-on-pms-academic-degree
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Kejriwal's plea against summons in defamation case on remarks on PM's academic degree

SC dismisses Kejriwal’s plea challenging summons in defamation case over remarks on PM Modi’s degree, upholding Gujarat University’s complaint.

21 October, 2024 05:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email