38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, November 02, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Upholds the Validity of The Tribunal Rules 2020

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      27 November, 2020 04:41 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Upholds the Validity of The Tribunal Rules 2020

The Madras Bar Association by way of writ petition in the Supreme Court has challenged the rules formulated in February 2020 known as the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2020 (The Tribunal Rules 2020).

The petition stated that the Tribunal Rules 2020 should be struck down as it poses a threat to Articles 14 (right to equality of law) and 21 (right to life) for being arbitrary and unreasonable against the principles of Separation of powers and independence of judiciary, and is in contravention of previous decisions of the Supreme Court,particularly the one in Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd.

Earlier on 9th October, 2020, the bench when reserving the matter for judgment clarified that whenever the term of any Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson or members of the Tribunal is expiring, the same stands extended till December 12, 2020.

The division bench comprising Justices L Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta and S Ravindra Bhat, directed the Central Government to constitute a National Tribunal Commission for the appointment of members in various Tribunals.

The most significant directions given by the bench are following

  1. Till the constitution of the National Tribunals Commission, a separate wing should be established at the Ministry of Finance to cater to the requirements of tribunals.
  2. Advocates with experience of 10 years will be eligible for appointment as judicial members in tribunals. Members of Indian Legal Service will also be eligible for appointment as judicial members provided they fulfill the same criteria as advocates.
  3. The Chief Justice of India or his nominee will have a casting vote in the search committee. The committee will also comprise Secretary to Ministry of Law and Justice and Secretary to Government of India from a department other than the parent or sponsoring department nominated by the cabinet secretary. The secretary of the sponsoring department shall be member secretary without vote.
  4. In respect of Matters for disciplinary action, the recommendations made by the Search and Selection committee shall be final.
  5. Appointments to tribunals shall be made within 3 months from the date on which the process is complete and recommendations are made by the search committee.
  6. The 2020 Rules shall have prospective effect and will be applicable only from February 12, 2020.
  7. Appointments made prior to 2017 Rules and appointments made during pendency of Rojer Mathew judgment shall be governed by respective statutes.
  8. Chairpersons, Vice-Chairpersons, and members of tribunals appointed prior to February 12, 2020 shall be governed by parent statute and rules as per which they were appointed.
  9. 2020 Rules shall be applicable with the modifications laid down in the judgment to those who were appointed after February 12, 2020.


Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

conviction-us-138-ni-act-cannot-be-ground-to-stop-pension-madras-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Conviction U/S 138 NI Act Cannot Be Ground To Stop Pension: Madras High Court [Read Order]

Madras HC rules conviction under Section 138 NI Act is not moral turpitude and cannot justify stopping pension of retired employee; directs release of dues.

01 November, 2025 04:08 PM
activists-claim-they-only-called-for-peaceful-protests-seek-bail-in-sc
Trending Judiciary
Activists claim they only called for peaceful protests, seek bail in SC

Activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and others tell SC they only called for peaceful anti-CAA protests, deny conspiracy in 2020 Delhi riots, seek bail under UAPA.

01 November, 2025 04:19 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-court-rejects-plea-against-ayodhya-judgment-slaps-6-lakh-costs-on-advocate-mehmood-pracha
Trending Judiciary
Delhi Court Rejects Plea Against Ayodhya Judgment, Slaps ₹6 Lakh Costs on Advocate Mehmood Pracha [Read Judgment]

Delhi District Court dismisses plea challenging Ayodhya verdict, imposes ₹6 lakh costs on advocate Mehmood Pracha for filing frivolous litigation.

27 October, 2025 11:58 AM
cji-gavai-recommends-for-appointment-of-justice-surya-kant-as-successor
Trending Legal Insiders
CJI Gavai recommends for appointment of Justice Surya Kant as successor

CJI Gavai recommends Justice Surya Kant as his successor. Justice Kant to become the 53rd Chief Justice of India, serving from Nov 24, 2025 to Feb 9, 2027.

27 October, 2025 12:37 PM
stray-dog-menace-sc-directs-for-presence-of-chief-secys-on-failure-to-file-reply
Trending Judiciary
Stray dog menace: SC directs for presence of Chief Secys on failure to file reply

SC pulls up states over stray dog menace; directs all Chief Secretaries to appear on Nov 3 for failing to file compliance affidavits on ABC Rules.

27 October, 2025 04:11 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-states-uts-on-digital-arrests-favours-cbi-probe
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to States, UTs on digital arrests; favours CBI probe

SC issues notice to all States & UTs on rising ‘digital arrest’ scams; favours CBI probe into pan-India cyber frauds targeting citizens.

27 October, 2025 05:30 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email