38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

[Sedition Case] Delhi Court Adjourns Sharjeel Imams Bail Plea To July 7

By Shashwata Sahu      10 June, 2022 05:35 PM      0 Comments
Sedition Case Against Sharjeel Imam Delhi Court Adjourned

On Friday, a Delhi court adjourned the interim bail of JNU student Sharjeel Imam until July 7, because the courts are on vacation from today.

The bail application of scholar and activist Sharjeel Imam, who was arrested under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for giving speeches against the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC), was reserved by a Delhi Court on Monday, June 6th.

After hearing arguments from both the prosecution and the defense counsel, Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat of the Karkardooma court put the matter on hold until June 10 and directed the prosecution to provide written submissions on or before the next date of hearing.

The Delhi High Court had previously ordered the scholar to apply for bail in a lower court after the prosecution objected to Sharjeel's plea being maintainable. The prosecution informed the Delhi High Court that, pursuant to a Supreme Court judgement from 2014, any such bail application must first be made to the trial court, and only if relief is not granted there, may the accused go to the High Court, as the case is only triable by a Special Court. Sharjeel then went to the Apex Court.

As per Sharjeel's counsel, Sharjeel Imam should be given bail in light of the Supreme Court's recent order that all pending appeals and proceedings relating to the charges established under Section 124A (Sedition) of the Indian Penal Code be put on hold.

The trial court denied Sharjeel's bail application, stating that a prima facie offence under Section 124A had been established against him, which no longer holds ground in light of the Apex Court's decision.

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

TOP STORIES

in-house-procedure-had-legal-sanctity-sc-dismisses-justice-varmas-plea-against-recommendation-for-removal
Trending Judiciary
'In-house procedure had legal sanctity,' SC dismisses Justice Varma's plea against recommendation for removal

SC upholds in-house probe into Justice Varma, dismisses his plea against removal; says process is legally valid and judge’s conduct lacked credibility.

07 August, 2025 12:05 PM
sole-testimony-of-victim-even-without-medical-evidence-sufficient-to-uphold-rape-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sole testimony of victim even without medical evidence sufficient to uphold rape conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Victim’s sole testimony, even without medical evidence, sufficient to uphold rape conviction if found credible and consistent.

07 August, 2025 03:11 PM
sc-recalls-order-against-hc-judge-on-taking-away-criminal-roster
Trending Judiciary
SC recalls order against HC judge on taking away criminal roster

SC recalls order removing HC judge from criminal roster, cites institutional dignity; says directions weren’t to embarrass but to uphold judicial integrity.

08 August, 2025 12:43 PM
sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email