38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Setback for WB govt,' SC dismisses review petition in teachers’ recruitment scam case [Read Order]

By Jhanak Sharma      21 August, 2025 02:09 PM      0 Comments
Setback for WB govt SC dismisses review petition in teachers recruitment scam case

NEW DELHI: In a setback to the West Bengal government, the Supreme Court has dismissed a plea by the state government and others seeking review of its judgment, which upheld a decision invalidating the appointment of 25,753 teachers and other staff in state-run and state-aided schools over there.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kumar and Satish Chandra Sharma said the judgment of April 3, 2025 was passed after hearing extensive and exhaustive arguments and upon considering all aspects, factual, and legal.

“The settled legal position obtained on the strength of case law was duly considered in the context of the illegalities in the selection process brought out by the reports of the Justice (Retd.) Bag Committee and the Central Bureau of Investigation along with the admissions made by the West Bengal Central School Service Commission and the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education in their counter affidavits," the bench said in its order on August 5, 2025.

The bench noted that the failure on the part of the West Bengal Central School Service Commission to retain the original physical OMR sheets or at least the mirror copies thereof was a significant factor which weighed with the high court and with this court.

“Further, the cover-up of lapses and illegalities by the authorities made verification and ascertainment more difficult, leading to the inevitable conviction that the entire selection process was compromised owing to such illegalities. The entire selection, therefore, had to be invalidated to maintain the sanctity of the process of selection, which should be pristine and free of all such infirmities,” the bench said.

However, the interests of the appointed candidates who were untainted were sought to be protected to the greatest extent possible, as is evident from the concluding paragraphs of the judgment, the bench said.

The bench said no doubt, invalidation of such untainted appointments would lead to heartburn and anguish, which the court was fully conscious of, but protecting the purity of the selection process is paramount and necessarily has to be given the highest priority.

“Last, but not the least, the adverse remarks made against the authorities concerned, who were wholly and solely responsible for this entire imbroglio, adversely affecting the lives of thousands of candidates, untainted and tainted, were fully warranted and justified," the bench said.

The bench said these review petitions which, in effect, seek a re-hearing of the entire matter on merits, therefore, do not deserve to be entertained as all relevant aspects have already been examined and considered comprehensively.

“The applications for listing the review petitions in open court are, accordingly, rejected. The review petitions are dismissed. Other interlocutory applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of,” the bench said.

On April 3, 2025, a bench of then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar said this is a case where the entire selection process is vitiated and tainted beyond resolution, and manipulation and frauds on large scale have tainted the selection process beyond repair.

The Calcutta High Court had on April 22, 2024 invalidated the appointment of 25,753 teachers and other staff in state-run and state-aided schools of West Bengal, citing irregularities such as OMR sheet tampering and rank-jumping.

The scam related to the 2016 recruitment came as a major embarassment for the Mamata Banerjee government as its Minister and senior officials were caught with huge piles of cash alleged collected from undeserving candidates for appointments.

 [Read Order]

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Corruption 

Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Order to appoint One Man Committee of Justice (Retd.) Lokur for the Prevention of Stubble Burning Kept in Abeyance by SC itself [READ ORDER] Order to appoint One Man Committee of Justice (Retd.) Lokur for the Prevention of Stubble Burning Kept in Abeyance by SC itself [READ ORDER]

CJI suggests holding measures in abeyance, questioning the PIL petitioner in the stubble burning case. Justice (Retd.) Madan B Lokur's role also discussed.

"Experts Say Your Beautiful Cars Also Contribute to Air Pollution," CJI SA Bobde Says While Hearing Stubble Burning Issue "Experts Say Your Beautiful Cars Also Contribute to Air Pollution," CJI SA Bobde Says While Hearing Stubble Burning Issue

Chief Justice of India S.A. Bobde ensures no stubble burning orders will be passed without considering petitioners' input, confirms Senior Advocate Vikas Singh.

Centre states that Farmers Stubble Burning contributes to 10% Pollution; SC retailitates saying, 'Pollution is caused by city-related issues. Take care of them and then we will come to stubble burning' Centre states that Farmers Stubble Burning contributes to 10% Pollution; SC retailitates saying, 'Pollution is caused by city-related issues. Take care of them and then we will come to stubble burning'

Supreme Court urges Centre, Punjab, Haryana, and UP to implement work-from-home due to air pollution. Next hearing set for November 17, 2021.

WhatsApp Assures High Court Of Full Cooperation In Dhanbad Judge Murder Case WhatsApp Assures High Court Of Full Cooperation In Dhanbad Judge Murder Case

The CBI has charged auto-rickshaw driver Lakhan Verma and his brother Rahul with murder and false information, invoking IPC Sections 302, 201, and 34.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email