38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, October 11, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Stem Cell Treatment To Continue Until Licences Under New Drugs And Clinical Rules, 2019 Are Processed: Delhi HC

By LawStreet News Network      06 June, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Stem Cell Treatment To Continue Until Licences Under New Drugs And Clinical Rules, 2019 Are Processed: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court on May 28, 2019, in the case of Shikha v. Union of India and Anr., has allowed a clinic in New Delhi to continue providing a treatment called Embryonic Stem Cell therapy to certain patients until licenses under the New Drugs and Clinical Rules, 2019, for providing stem cell treatments are processed.

The order was passed by a Division Bench comprising of JusticesG.S. Sistani and Jyoti Singh on a petition filed by two patients of Cerebral Palsy, which is a movement disorder caused by abnormal development or damage to the parts of the brain that control movement, balance and posture.

In this case, the petitioners visited a clinic Nutech Mediworld at Green Park, New Delhi to receive stem cell treatments called Embryonic Stem Cell therapy. Both the petitioners claimed that they have shown visible improvement since the transplantation of Embryonic Stem Cells, from October 2018 onwards as compared to their medical condition prior to the commencement of their treatment.

The petitioners approached the High Court pursuant to a notification - New Drugs and Clinical Rules, 2019, issued by the Central Government. As per the Rules, stem cell-derived products were included under the definition of new drugs which required approval from the concerned authority under the Rules before it could be provided to patients.

Embryonic Stem Cell therapy fell under the definition of new drugs and could thus not be provided anymore without the requisite approval under the Rule. As the clinic stopped providing medical treatment to the petitioners they were compelled to move the High Court.

The learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners contended that the treatment was required for the day-to-day sustenance of their lives and basic activities, and in case, this treatment is discontinued further, it would lead to a serious impact on the health of the petitioners.

It was also pointed out that till the rules fall in place and the marketing license is provided during the intervening period, serious prejudice would be caused to the health of the petitioners.

By the time an application is made to the concerned authority i.e. The Drug Controller under the Central Government and a decision is taken, at least a few months would lapse, jeopardizing the life of the petitioners, the counsel submitted.

The petitioners, therefore, sought a direction to the Central Government to allow Nutech Mediworld clinic to continue to provide the treatment to the petitioners till such time the formalities are completed or till Nutech Mediworld clinic or at least some other clinic obtains a licence.

After hearing the parties, the court concluded that in these circumstances, it was apposite to direct, as in interim measure, that the treatment being provided to the petitioner would not be impeded.

.. as an interim measure and till such time Nutech Mediworld clinic or at least some other clinic applies for a licence and the licence is processed, the Nutech Mediworld clinic would continue to provide treatment to the petitioners, the court said.

However, before parting with the case, the court directed the clinic to submit all the information with respect to the treatment being afforded to the petitioners to the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSO), within a period of one week.

The Authority shall then examine whether the said treatment or the products being administered to the petitioners, prima facie, fell within the scope of New Drugs and communicate its view to the petitioners and the clinic.

In view of the agreed directions, the court disposed of the writ petition.

Read the order below.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-seeks-centre-ecs-response-on-pil-for-voting-rights-to-undertrial-prisoners
Trending Judiciary
SC seeks Centre, EC's response on PIL for voting rights to undertrial prisoners

SC seeks Centre and EC’s reply on plea seeking voting rights for 4.5 lakh undertrial prisoners; petitioner says blanket ban under RPA violates constitutional norms.

10 October, 2025 02:17 PM
sex-education-must-be-from-younger-age-not-from-class-ix-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sex education must be from younger age, not from class IX: SC [Read Order]

SC stresses that sex education must begin at a younger age, not from Class IX, and be included in the school curriculum to guide children through puberty.

10 October, 2025 02:37 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email