38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Plea in SUPREME COURT against Delhi High Court Interviewing Public Prosecutor Nominee

By LawStreet News Network      12 May, 2022 12:20 PM      0 Comments
SUPREME COURT against Delhi High Court Public Prosecutor Nominee

Plea in SUPREME COURT AGAINST DELHI HIGH COURT INTERVIEWING PUBLIC PROSECUTOR NOMINEE; DEMANDS FOR NOTIFYING CANDIDATES SELECTED BY DELHI GOVTS PANEL AND APPROVED BY LG.

Practicing Lawyer Amit Sahni has approached Supreme Court against Delhi High Courts call to interview/interact with the candidates selected by the Delhi Govts committee and approved by the Honble LG of Delhi on 04-03-2020, for representing Criminal Matters before the Honble High Court of Delhi as Standing Counsel, Additional Standing Counsel, Additional Public Prosecutors.

The petitions submit that the interviews for purpose of selection of Advocates for the aforesaid Civil and Criminal Panel were conducted by a selection committee headed by the Honble Law Minister, Law Secretary and the Secretary (Home), Govt. of NCT of Delhi in last year December and Committee forwarded names of selected Advocates to the Honble LG, which approved the appointments of both Civil Panel and Criminal Panel Lawyers to represent cases before the High Court of Delhi on 04-03-2022.

Later notification was issued on 04-03-2022 in exercise of powers conferred under sub section (7) of section 2 of the code of civil procedure (5 of 1908) and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the Lt. Governor of NCT of Delhi regarding Civil Panel Counsels before Delhi High Court.  

But the list, in respect of the Standing Counsel, Additional Standing Counsel, Additional Public Prosecutor and Penal Counsel (to represent criminal matters), the names of candidates were also finally selected by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi and approved by the Honble LG of Delhi on 04-03-2022 and the same were forwarded to the Honble High Court of Delhi as required under section 24 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and such names have been put on hold since march this year as the same are not cleared as yet.

Amit Sahni had made a representation dated 19-04-2022 to CJI and Acting CJI, requesting that the recommendations of the Selection Committee of GNCTD and approved by LG of Delhi (on 04-03-2022) be given effect to in terms of section 24(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (as amended upto date) and the process of de-novo interview of candidates be recalled in order to avoid the conflict of powers between the Judiciary and the Executive and also in the interest of justice.

Mentioning no action has been taken upon the same to the knowledge of the Petitioner till date, Mr. Sahni moved SC for seeking its interreference.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-dismisses-pil-challenging-ecis-mass-transfer-of-officers-in-west-bengal
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses PIL Challenging ECI’s Mass Transfer of Officers in West Bengal [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging ECI’s mass transfer of officers in West Bengal, upholding its powers under Article 324.

31 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM
sc-dismisses-challenge-to-mha-circular-on-vande-mataram-terms-apprehensions-premature
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Challenge to MHA Circular on ‘Vande Mataram’; Terms Apprehensions Premature

Supreme Court dismisses plea against MHA’s ‘Vande Mataram’ circular, calls concerns premature as directive is advisory with no mandatory or penal effect.

26 March, 2026 04:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email