38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Allows Bihar Caste Census Data Publication, Sets January 2024 Hearing for Legal Challenge

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      06 October, 2023 03:59 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Allows Bihar Caste Census Data Publication Sets January  Hearing for Legal Challenge

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday declined to order status quo on the Bihar government's decision to collect and publish contentious caste census data.

As the Bihar government already published the data on October 2, a bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and S V N Bhatti said there can't be a status quo order for now as restraining the state government from taking a policy decision would be wrong.

"We cannot stop the state government or any government from taking a decision, the bench orally observed

The bench, however, asked the state government as to why it published the data.

Responding to the query, senior advocate Shyam Divan on behalf of the Bihar government submitted that the court never passed any order against the publication of the date and this court had indicated that it will first and foremost decide whether notice is to be issued.

The bench then said, "We are going to examine the right of State to collect the data and all other issues."

The court issued notice to the state government on a batch of petitions challenging the Patna High Court's decision which upheld the state government's decision to conduct the caste census.

The court scheduled the matter for hearing in January, 2024.

It sought a response from the state government within four weeks on the petition filed by NGO 'Ek Soch Ek Prayas' and others. It also gave four weeks time for the petitioners to file rejoinder thereafter.

Senior advocate Aparajita Singh, appearing for the petitioners, contended the state government has published the caste census and preempted this court from examining the validity of the matter, despite previous assurance against it.

The bench, however, said there was no such assurance from the state government.

The petitioners then sought a status quo and a direction to the state government restraining it from acting on the data. They said that the state's decision to collect caste details was contrary to the Supreme Court's judgement in the K S Puttaswamy, which recognised the right to privacy as a fundamental right.

The bench, however, declined it. It also rejected the arguments with regard to privacy.

"Normally, all policies depend and based on data. We will hear you out. The High Court judgement is fairly detailed," the bench told the petitioners.

The bench said it would consider as to how much breakdown of data could be made available to the general public as it involved the question of transparency or whether the court should examine this issue.

The Patna High Court had on August 1 approved the Bihar government's decision of June 6, 2022 to conduct a caste census in the state. The HC had said the exercise was perfectly valid, and (is) initiated with due competence, with the legitimate aim of providing development with justice; as proclaimed in the address to both Houses.

On October 2, 2023, the Bihar government went on to publish the data on caste census.

The petitioners claimed the entire exercise of collecting caste data was without authority, and legislative competence and reeked of mala fide. The petitioners said in terms of constitutional mandate, only the Union Government is empowered to conduct census.

The Ministry of Home Affairs, in an affidavit, said census is a statutory process and is governed by the Census Act, 1948.

"The subject of Census is covered in the Union List under Entry 69 in the Seventh Schedule. In exercise of the powers under the said Entry, the central government has made the Census Act, 1948. The said Act empowers only the central government to conduct the census under section 3 of the Census Act, 1948," it had said.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-sets-aside-bail-to-actor-darshan-warns-jail-officials-against-vip-treatment
Trending CelebStreet
SC sets aside bail to actor Darshan; warns jail officials against VIP treatment

SC cancels bail to actor Darshan in murder case; slams VIP jail perks, warns officials to uphold rule of law and treat all accused equally.

14 August, 2025 12:30 PM
sc-refuses-stay-on-directions-for-immediate-shifting-of-stray-dogs-to-shelter-homes
Trending Judiciary
SC refuses stay on directions for immediate shifting of stray dogs to shelter homes

SC refuses to stay order directing urgent relocation of stray dogs in Delhi-NCR; asks intervenors to file affidavits amid rising dog bite concerns.

14 August, 2025 03:33 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email