38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Allows Live Streaming Of Cases.

By LawStreet News Network      26 September, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Allows Live Streaming Of Cases.

The Supreme Court today (September 26th, 2018) allowed the live streaming of court proceedings of Constitutional importance that take place in the Court of the Chief Justice of India.

A Bench comprising of Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, Justice AM Khanwilkar and Justice DY Chandrachud while delivering the judgment has said that necessary rules balancing the right of public and protecting dignity of litigants would be framed soon.

The Bench noting that the live streaming of the cases would bring in transparency and serve the public interest has said that "Sunlight is the best disinfectant, let people get first-hand information about what is going on in court room proceedings."

The verdict came on the batch of petitions filed by senior advocate Indira Jaising, law student Swapnil Tripathi and NGO 'Centre For Accountability and Systemic Change' on the issue.

Jaising, in her PIL, had sought video-recording of proceedings on matters of national importance. While petitioner, Swapnil Tripathi, a student of National Law University in Jodhpur, had sought requisite guidelines to facilitate witnessing of the proceedings for interns and suggested for setting up live streaming rooms within the apex court premises.

The court had sought assistance from Attorney General K K Venugopal on the issue, who had said that live streaming could be introduced as a pilot project in the Court of Chief Justice of India on matters of constitutional importance.

Further, Venugopal had said the success of this project would determine whether live streaming should be introduced in other courts of the apex court and in courts across the country.

After hearing the proposed guidelines as laid by Venugopal, the Court had reserved its order on August 24, 2018.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email