38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Backs Homebuyers’ Right to Peaceful Protest, Quashes Defamation Case [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      21 April, 2025 01:55 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Backs Homebuyers Right to Peaceful Protest Quashes Defamation Case

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday quashed a defamation complaint filed against the homebuyers for putting up a poster raising their grievances against the real estate developer in 2016, finding that the manner of the protest resorted to was peaceful and orderly and without in any manner using offensive or abusive language.

"A right to protest peacefully without falling foul of the law is a corresponding right, which the consumers ought to possess just as the seller enjoys his right to commercial speech. Any attempt to portray them as criminal offences, when the necessary ingredients are not made out, would be a clear abuse of process and should be nipped in the bud," a bench of Justices K V Vishwanathan and N Kotiswar Singh said.

On a plea by Shahed Kamal and others against Bombay High Court's order refusing to quash the summons against them, the bench said, it could not be said that the appellants crossed the 'Lakshman Rekha' and transgressed into the offending zone.

"Their case wholly falls within the sweep, scope and ambit of exception 9 to Section 499. Their peaceful protest is protected by Article 19(1)(a) (b) and (c) of the Constitution of India. The criminal proceedings levelled against them, if allowed to continue, will be a clear abuse of process," Justice Vishwanathan wrote in a 32-page judgment on behalf of the bench.

The court set aside the judgment and order of June 10, 2024 in passed by the High Court and quashed the complaint pending before Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Borivali, Mumbai and the summons issued on October 4, 2016 under Section 500 read with Section 34 of the IPC.

The bench said, one of the tests to decide whether the case falls within the 9th exception is the choice of words employed in the publication.

"What is significant, therefore, that in a given case, the language employed could be a clear pointer to decide whether the accused in the case has exceeded his privilege. We have already found that the appellants could not have said anything less in the poster/banner as they believed that this was rightful and legitimate to highlight their grievances, which they contend were ignored earlier," the bench said.

The complaint was filed by M/s A Surti Developers Pvt Ltd against the homebuyers for the banner put on August 10, 2015.

The bench said, homebuyers and developers have not always been the best of friends. Instances are innumerable where the two have been at daggers drawn. This case presents one such instance.

Not satisfied with the services provided by the respondent-developer and when, according to them, repeated entreaties did not elicit a response, the appellant-home buyers decided to resort to a unique form of protest, the court said.

The banner raised the grievances in respect of not forming the society even after 18 months, not giving society accounts, not co-operating with the residents, not attending to builders’ defects, not sorting water issue, poor lift maintenance, leakage problem, plumbing issues, dirty/bouncy approach road, broken podium, shabby garden, ignoring grievances and noncooperation. There is a caption “we protest for our rights”.

The bench, however, said, "What strikes us is that there is no foul or intemperate language employed against the respondent. There is no reference to any expression like “fraud, cheating, misappropriation etc.”"

In mild and temperate language, certain issues, which the appellants perceived as their grievances have been aired, the bench said.

"The careful choice of the words, the conscious avoidance of intemperate, rude or abusive language and the peaceful manner of protest, all point to the fact that to protect their legitimate interests and the interest of the other homeowners and without any malice and in good faith the erection of the banner was done," the bench said.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email