38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, September 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court imposes cost on the Central government of Rs 7,500 for failing to respond to a petition to identify minorities based on state population [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      02 February, 2022 06:47 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Central government petition minorities state population

The Supreme Court on Monday fined the Central government of Rs 7,500 for failing to respond to a public interest litigation petition filed by Ashwini Upadhyay, BJP leader and Advocate [Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India]. He had sought to identify and grant minority status to communities based on their population at the state level.

The Central government was fined by a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundresh for missing deadlines to present a response affidavit in the matter.

"We grant one further opportunity of four weeks to learned counsel for the respondents to file the counter affidavit subject to deposit of costs of 7,500 with Supreme Court Bar Association Advocates Welfare Fund as requested by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner," the Court said.

The Supreme Court sent notice to the Central government in August 2020, and four adjournments were granted after that.

"We may note that the respondents entered appearance on October 12, 2020 and took time to file counter affidavit. Thereafter counter affidavit has not been filed despite repeated opportunities. On January 7, 2022, last opportunity was granted to the respondent to file counter affidavit within four weeks," the Court said in its order.

According to the appeal, the Central government declared five communities, namely Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Parsis, as minorities in a notification dated October 23, 1993, without defining the term "minority" or establishing procedures for identification at the state level.

"Hindus are merely 1% in Ladakh, 2.75% in Mizoram, 2.77% in Lakshadweep, 4% in Kashmir, 8.74% in Nagaland, 11.52% in Meghalaya, 29% in Arunachal Pradesh, 3849% in Punjab and 41.29% in Manipur but Central Government has not declared them 'minority' under Section 2(c) of the NCM Act and Section 2(f) of the NCMEI Act, thus Hindus are not protected under Articles 29-30 and cannot establish-administer educational institution of their choice," the petition stated.

On the other hand, by using unbridled power under the NCMEI Act, 2006 the Centre has arbitrarily declared Muslims as a minority, who are 96.58 per cent in Lakshadweep, 95 per cent in Kashmir & 46 per cent in Laddakh, it was pointed out.

"Centre has declared Christians as a minority, who are 88.10% in Nagaland, 87.16% in Mizoram & 74.59% in Meghalaya so they can establish & administer educational institution of their choice. Likewise, Sikhs are 57.69% in Punjab & Buddhists are so% in Laddakh and they can establish & administer educational institutions but not the followers of Bahaism & Judaism, who are merely 0.1% and 0.2% respectively," the plea claimed.

The matter has now been listed for hearing on March 28.

 

The order has been attached. [Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

we-have-sympathies-sc-refuses-to-entertain-plea-by-minor-boy-against-torture-by-guj-police
Trending Judiciary
'We have sympathies,' SC refuses to entertain plea by minor boy against torture by Guj police

SC tells minor’s sister to move Gujarat HC over custodial torture plea, says “we have sympathies” but won’t entertain case in top court.

16 September, 2025 11:07 AM
cant-stop-ec-from-sir-across-country-but-strike-it-down-if-any-illegality-found-sc
Trending Judiciary
Can't stop EC from SIR across country but strike it down if any illegality found: SC

SC says it can’t halt EC’s nationwide electoral roll revision, but will strike down Bihar’s SIR if illegality found. Hearing on Oct 7.

16 September, 2025 11:21 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-disapproves-kerala-hc-directly-entertaining-pre-arrest-bails
Trending Judiciary
SC disapproves Kerala HC directly entertaining pre arrest bails [Read Order]

SC slams Kerala HC practice of directly entertaining anticipatory bail pleas, says litigants must first approach Sessions Court unless in exceptional cases.

11 September, 2025 01:58 PM
sc-quashes-cheque-dishonour-complaint-filed-5-days-late-rules-30-day-limit-under-ni-act-is-mandatory
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes Cheque Dishonour Complaint Filed 5 Days Late, Rules 30-Day Limit Under NI Act is Mandatory [Read Order]

SC quashes cheque dishonour complaint filed 5 days late, rules 30-day limit under NI Act is mandatory and delay needs proper condonation process.

11 September, 2025 02:32 PM
sc-upholds-order-for-lodging-fir-against-ex-delhi-police-chief-neeraj-kumar
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Order For Lodging FIR Against Ex-Delhi Police Chief Neeraj Kumar [Read Judgment]

SC upholds HC order to lodge FIR against ex-Delhi Police chief Neeraj Kumar, citing abuse of power, threats & intimidation in 2000 case.

11 September, 2025 02:48 PM
sc-quashes-rape-case-on-false-promise-of-marriage-terms-it-gross-abuse-of-law
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes Rape Case on False Promise of Marriage, Terms It ‘Gross Abuse of Law’ [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes rape case on false promise of marriage, calling it a gross abuse of law and slams frivolous, vexatious allegations.

11 September, 2025 03:02 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email