38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, January 20, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court imposes cost on the Central government of Rs 7,500 for failing to respond to a petition to identify minorities based on state population [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      02 February, 2022 06:47 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Central government petition minorities state population

The Supreme Court on Monday fined the Central government of Rs 7,500 for failing to respond to a public interest litigation petition filed by Ashwini Upadhyay, BJP leader and Advocate [Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India]. He had sought to identify and grant minority status to communities based on their population at the state level.

The Central government was fined by a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundresh for missing deadlines to present a response affidavit in the matter.

"We grant one further opportunity of four weeks to learned counsel for the respondents to file the counter affidavit subject to deposit of costs of 7,500 with Supreme Court Bar Association Advocates Welfare Fund as requested by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner," the Court said.

The Supreme Court sent notice to the Central government in August 2020, and four adjournments were granted after that.

"We may note that the respondents entered appearance on October 12, 2020 and took time to file counter affidavit. Thereafter counter affidavit has not been filed despite repeated opportunities. On January 7, 2022, last opportunity was granted to the respondent to file counter affidavit within four weeks," the Court said in its order.

According to the appeal, the Central government declared five communities, namely Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Parsis, as minorities in a notification dated October 23, 1993, without defining the term "minority" or establishing procedures for identification at the state level.

"Hindus are merely 1% in Ladakh, 2.75% in Mizoram, 2.77% in Lakshadweep, 4% in Kashmir, 8.74% in Nagaland, 11.52% in Meghalaya, 29% in Arunachal Pradesh, 3849% in Punjab and 41.29% in Manipur but Central Government has not declared them 'minority' under Section 2(c) of the NCM Act and Section 2(f) of the NCMEI Act, thus Hindus are not protected under Articles 29-30 and cannot establish-administer educational institution of their choice," the petition stated.

On the other hand, by using unbridled power under the NCMEI Act, 2006 the Centre has arbitrarily declared Muslims as a minority, who are 96.58 per cent in Lakshadweep, 95 per cent in Kashmir & 46 per cent in Laddakh, it was pointed out.

"Centre has declared Christians as a minority, who are 88.10% in Nagaland, 87.16% in Mizoram & 74.59% in Meghalaya so they can establish & administer educational institution of their choice. Likewise, Sikhs are 57.69% in Punjab & Buddhists are so% in Laddakh and they can establish & administer educational institutions but not the followers of Bahaism & Judaism, who are merely 0.1% and 0.2% respectively," the plea claimed.

The matter has now been listed for hearing on March 28.

 

The order has been attached. [Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

accused-need-not-appear-on-every-date-after-bail-in-appeals-sc
Trending Judiciary
Accused Need Not Appear on Every Date After Bail in Appeals: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules accused on bail after suspension of sentence need not appear on every hearing date in appellate or revisional courts.

19 January, 2026 12:47 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-press-councils-rejection-of-editors-guilds-claim-in-15th-press-council-constitution
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Press Council’s Rejection of Editors Guild’s Claim in 15th Press Council Constitution [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upheld Press Council of India’s rejection of Editors Guild’s claim, citing delay and non-compliance, and declined to interfere in 15th Press Council constitution.

19 January, 2026 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

madras-hc-seeks-larger-bench-to-reconsider-bar-on-enrolment-of-law-graduates-with-pending-criminal-cases
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Seeks Larger Bench To Reconsider Bar On Enrolment Of Law Graduates With Pending Criminal Cases [Read Order]

Madras High Court refers to larger bench to reconsider bar on enrolment of law graduates with pending criminal cases under Advocates Act.

15 January, 2026 05:28 PM
madras-hc-state-organizes-jallikattu-at-avaniyapuram-private-committees-cannot-claim-independent-right
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC: State Organizes Jallikattu at Avaniyapuram; Private Committees Cannot Claim Independent Right [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that only the State can organize Jallikattu at Avaniyapuram; private committees have no independent right to conduct the event.

15 January, 2026 05:52 PM
sc-delivers-split-verdict-on-section-17a-of-prevention-of-corruption-act-refers-matter-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Delivers Split Verdict on Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, Refers Matter to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court delivers a split verdict on Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, with judges differing on its validity and referring the issue to a larger bench.

15 January, 2026 08:04 PM
daughter-in-law-widowed-after-father-in-laws-death-entitled-to-maintenance-from-his-estate-sc
Trending Judiciary
Daughter-in-Law Widowed After Father-in-Law’s Death Entitled to Maintenance from His Estate: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that a daughter-in-law widowed after her father-in-law’s death can claim maintenance from his estate under Hindu law.

15 January, 2026 09:03 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email