38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Clears The Way For Opening Of Dance Bars In Mumbai

By LawStreet News Network      17 January, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Clears The Way For Opening Of Dance Bars In Mumbai

The Supreme Court today i.e., January 17, 2019, has cleared the way for the opening of dance bars in Mumbai by quashing some of the stringent rules prescribed by the Maharashtra government.

A Bench comprising of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was hearing a batch of petitions filed by women working in Maharashtras bars, including dancers and waitresses, against the constitutionality of The Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women (working therein) Act, 2016.

The court did away with some mandatory conditions imposed by a 2016 State law, like the installation of CCTV cameras at the dance area as a violation of privacy.

The court also set aside the condition that only persons of good character would be allowed to run dance bars, saying the term good character is too vague. Moreover, the condition that dance bars should not be allowed within one kilometer radius from educational institutions and religious places has also been set aside on the ground that the condition is "unworkable" in Mumbai city.

Further, the court noting that dance and liquor can co-exist, it said that there is no need to segregate the area where liquor is served to patrons from the dancing area.

The court, however, stopped patrons from showering money at the performers. It also upheld the condition that dance bars should operate only between 6 p.m. and 11.30 p.m.

In the petition filed by the Bharatiya Bargirls Union, it was argued that the 2016 law stigmatises their profession and unreasonably interfered with their free choice of expression through dramatic performances.

The act of tipping or giving gifts as a token of appreciation has been customary and an integral part of traditional dance culture. This decades-old practice is akin to those performing Mujra, Lavani [traditional Marathi song and dance] or Tamasha [traditional Marathi theatre] where performers earn their living through bakshisi offered by the audience as a token of appreciation of the performances, their petition had said.

The 2016 State law was passed by the State Assembly to circumvent a Supreme Court judgment of 2015 which ordered dance bars to be thrown open again and classified dance as a profession.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email