38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, February 11, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Declines to Entertain Jairam Rameshs Plea

By Ghazal Bhootra      08 May, 2020 12:46 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Congress JairamRameshSupreme Court Congress JairamRamesh

On 5th May 2020, the Supreme Court declined Senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh's plea asking for orders to the Centre and state governments to make certain that there is universal coverage of food security during the ongoing Corona Virus pandemic outbreak while asking the politician to make a representation to the Central government.

The court noticed how people were approaching the apex court under provisions of Article 32 of the Constitution without trying to make any representation to the government authorities.

A bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice B R Gavai, which adjudged the matter through the platform of video conferencing, mentioned the court has found that grievances and issues brought forward in the petition have not been raised in front of the government, hence it is permitting the petition to be withdrawn.

The top court said the petitioner should give a detailed representation to the Centre, which will be examined by the union government.

Senior Advocate Salman Khurshid, representing Ramesh, told the court that the issue put forward in the petition is related to food security and the petitioner himself was a contributory in the making of the National Food Security Act of 2013.

He raised an argument about how many citizens have shifted from their places of work to their native towns and villages. Since they have ration cards of their local place, these are unaccepted by the officials in the area to which they have gone back.

He also mentioned that some may not even have ration cards, to begin with.

The bench inquired whether any representation has been given to the authorities responsible for this matter.

He admitted that there was no representation made to the authorities but mentioned that the matter is not antagonistic and only aspires to assist the government in serving its citizens.

The bench remarked that people are advancing to court without even making a representation to the government and authorities concerned and such petitions should be introduced only after some initiative already taken.

Khurshid asserted that the government has proclaimed doubling of rations to the ration card holders but what happens to those who either don't have it at all or don't have it with them at the time of necessity is unknown.

He observed that the government's one ration card plan is still to fall into place and till then the top courts decision in Swaraj Abhiyan case, in which it was adjudged that ration cards will not be required during natural disasters like drought, should be applied.

To this statement, the bench stated that somebody who is not in his place of work may concur some problems. The state government can take care of those who have gone back to their native places.

It said that in a circumstances like the COVID-19 pandemic, where the difficulties are large, some anomalies may take place.

The bench mentioned that it can ask Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the case for the Centre, to analyze the issues raised and optimistically stated that after the third phase of lockdown, things should begin looking better.

Mehta said that the Central Government would take note of the grievance with due respect. Ramesh observed in his petition that reports propose that large sections of the poor and vulnerable are not able to acquire food during the lockdown period due to the ongoing global pandemic.

The former Union minister asserted that there has been food shortage due to the lockdown and hence, there is a need for the application of the National Food Security Act, 2013, and other such measures.

"In the facts and circumstances as stated above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Court may be graciously pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other writ, order or direction to the Respondents to ensure that the National Food Security Act, 2013 is being implemented rigorously by all States," the petition stated.

It also sought an order for the qualified authorities to get rid of the mandatory requirement of delivery of grains against the production of ration cards during the lockdown.

Ramesh has also asked for directions from the Supreme Court explaining that households would be spared from Aadhaar card based biometric checking for obtaining food grains under the Public Distribution System.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

big-legal-tech-meet-at-delhi-hc-sc-judge-sanjay-karol-to-be-chief-guest-at-indian-law-and-ai-congress-2026
Trending Legal Insiders
Big Legal-Tech Meet at Delhi HC, SC Judge Sanjay Karol to be Chief Guest at Indian Law & AI Congress 2026

Indian Law & AI Congress 2026 at Delhi High Court on Feb 11. Justice Sanjay Karol to be chief guest. Live streaming by LawStreet Journal.

10 February, 2026 10:27 AM
kerala-hc-affirms-vicarious-liability-of-managing-director-under-section-141-ni-act-for-dishonoured-cheques
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Affirms Vicarious Liability of Managing Director Under Section 141 NI Act for Dishonoured Cheques [Read Order]

Kerala High Court upholds Managing Director’s vicarious liability under Section 141 NI Act in cheque dishonour case, citing Supreme Court guidelines.

10 February, 2026 11:41 AM

TOP STORIES

karnataka-hc-quashes-disqualification-of-councillors-over-pre-election-auction-participation
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes Disqualification Of Councillors Over Pre-Election Auction Participation [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court quashes councillors’ disqualification over pre-election auction benefits, holds Section 26(1)(k) inapplicable.

05 February, 2026 11:29 AM
karnataka-hc-upholds-acquittal-in-pocso-case-cites-inconsistent-testimony-and-failure-to-prove-victims-age
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Upholds Acquittal in POCSO Case, Cites Inconsistent Testimony and Failure to Prove Victim’s Age [Read Judgment]

Karnataka High Court upholds acquittal in a POCSO case, citing inconsistent testimony and failure to prove the victim’s age.

05 February, 2026 12:22 PM
kerala-hc-closes-pil-on-pedestrian-safety-allows-petitioners-to-raise-future-grievances
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Closes PIL on Pedestrian Safety, Allows Petitioners to Raise Future Grievances [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court closes PIL on pedestrian safety, notes NHAI grievance app compliance, allows petitioners to raise future grievances.

05 February, 2026 12:47 PM
resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email