38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court criticises Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association for Strike, seeks undertaking to abide by law

By Jhanak Sharma      29 November, 2024 09:25 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court criticises Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association for Strike seeks undertaking to abide by law

New Delhi: The Supreme Court took a strong stance against the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association for their strike in July 2024, which disrupted thousands of litigants. The court, presided over by Justice Abhay Oka and Justice A.G. Masih, has directed the association to submit an unconditional undertaking by December 8, 2024, with the next hearing scheduled for December 13, 2024.

Lawyers’ Strike Declared Illegal: Supreme Court Reiterates Stance

The court emphasized that lawyer strikes have already been deemed illegal by a reportable judgment of the Supreme Court. The bench expressed dismay at the association’s hesitation to give an undertaking to abide by the law. Justice Oka remarked, “Thousands of litigants are affected because lawyers go on strike. You are aggravating the contempt by defending them.”

Bar Association’s Hesitation Sparks Supreme Court’s Ire

Jasdev Singh Brar, vice president of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association, faced sharp criticism for delaying the undertaking. Despite repeated questioning, Brar hesitated to make a clear statement, prompting the bench to consider issuing contempt notices and seeking disciplinary action.

“What troubles us is the hesitation. A dozen times we asked him (Brar), and there was great hesitation on his part to make a statement,” said Justice Oka.

Supreme Court Grants Time for Undertaking Submission

The acting vice president and acting joint secretary of the Bar Association ultimately assured the court of their intent to submit an unconditional undertaking to abide by the law. The court granted time until December 8, 2024, to file the undertaking, and the matter will be reviewed on December 13, 2024.

Lawyer Strikes Impact Thousands of Cases, Says Supreme Court

The bench underlined the adverse impact of lawyer strikes, highlighting that a minimum of 4,000 to 5,000 cases in the Punjab and Haryana High Court were affected. Justice Oka stated, “What is the fault of litigants who come to court on a particular day? You are holding them at ransom.”

Supreme Court on Justifications for Strikes

The counsel for the Bar Association attempted to justify the strike, stating it was a protest against delegating rent controllers’ powers to executive magistrates under the Rent Act. However, Justice Oka dismissed the justification, stating, “No ground, no ground. There are other ways to protest. Bar associations can pass strong resolutions on genuine issues, which can be very effective without resorting to strikes.”

Bar Association Ordered to Follow Supreme Court Judgments

Citing prior rulings on lawyer strikes, the court warned that the rule of law must prevail. Justice Oka pointed to a similar instance in Odisha, where 40 lawyers were suspended for engaging in strikes, and reminded the Bar Association of their professional obligations.

This case highlights the judiciary’s growing intolerance for disruptions in the justice delivery system caused by strikes, reaffirming its stance on protecting litigants’ rights.
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

father-of-deceased-pilot-in-ahmedabad-crash-moves-sc-for-court-monitored-probe
Trending Judiciary
Father of deceased pilot in Ahmedabad crash moves SC for court monitored probe

91-year-old father of pilot killed in Ahmedabad Air India crash moves SC seeking court-monitored probe into alleged biased and flawed investigation.

17 October, 2025 10:54 AM
child-cant-consent-to-sex-life-imprisonment-upheld-for-sexual-assault-on-minor-girl-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Can’t Consent to Sex — Life Imprisonment Upheld for Sexual Assault on Minor Girl: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC upholds life imprisonment for assault on minor SC girl, reiterating that a child cannot consent to sex; school records key for age proof.

17 October, 2025 11:45 AM
sc-criticizes-casual-declaration-of-witnesses-as-hostile-upholds-conviction-under-sc-st-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticizes Casual Declaration of Witnesses as Hostile, Upholds Conviction under SC/ST Act [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court slams casual practice of declaring witnesses hostile; upholds life imprisonment in SC/ST Act case involving rape of minor girl.

17 October, 2025 11:55 AM
delhi-hc-quashes-22-year-old-complaint-against-advocate-reiterates-that-a-lawyers-office-is-not-a-commercial-activity
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year Old Complaint Against Advocate, Reiterates That A Lawyer’s Office Is Not A Commercial Activity [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC quashes 22-year-old complaint against advocate, rules that a lawyer’s office is not a commercial activity under MDP 2001 and Building Bye-Laws.

17 October, 2025 01:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email