38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Judiciary

Supreme Court Declares Retroactive Prosecution of Central Govt Officers in Corruption Cases [Read Judgment]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      12 September, 2023 03:30 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Declares Retroactive Prosecution of Central Govt Officers in Corruption Cases [Read Judgment]

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday declared that its previous 2014 judgement, removing protection to central government officers from prosecution in corruption cases due to lack of sanction, would be applied retrospectively

It said that once a law is declared as unconstitutional or violative of fundamental rights, it would be treated as unenforceable and still born since its very inception.

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul ruled that its 2014 judgement -- which held Section 6A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act as invalid and unconstitutional-- would be applied retrospectively.

With this, all the pending cases against central government officers under the Prevention of Corruption Act since September 11, 2003, when the provision was inserted, and till 2014 can be prosecuted without the sanction and no trial would be held as vitiated in the absence of prior approval.

The bench also held that Article 20(1) of the Constitution has no applicability either to the validity or invalidity of Section 6A of the Delhi Sepcial Police Establishment Act.

Section 6A(1) of the DSPE Act was held to be invalid and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution by a five-judge bench on May 06, 2014 in the case of Subramanian Swamy.

Section 6A of the DSPE Act mandated the approval of central government to conduct inquiry or investigation for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 where such allegation relates to the employees of the central government of the level of Joint Secretary and above.

On behalf of accused-officers a question on applicability of the judgement was raised as Article 20(1) of the Constitution stated no person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of offence.

The Constitution bench answered the legal question if the 2014 would be applied retrospectively in its judgement.

"Once a law is declared to be unconstitutional, being violative of Part-III of the Constitution, then it would be held to be void ab initio, still born, unenforceable and non est," it said.

Referring to Article 13(2) of the Constitution and its interpretation by authoritative pronouncements, the bench also comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Abhay S Oka, Vikram Nath and J K Maheshwari, said, the declaration made by the Constitution bench in the case of Subramanian Swamy will have retrospective operation.

"Section 6A of the DSPE Act is held to be not in force from the date of its insertion i.e. September 11, 2003," the bench said.

The court dealt with the instant issue as the Constitution bench in Subramanian Swamy case did not decide was whether the declaration of Section 6A(1) of the DSPE Act to be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution would have retrospective effect or it would apply prospectively.

On May 6, 2014, the Constitution bench in Swamy's case held that Section 6A(1) was invalid and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

The provision required approval of the central government to conduct any inquiry or investigation into any offence alleged to have been committed under the PC Act, 1988 where such allegation related to the employees of the central government of the level of Joint Secretary and above. Such prior approval was also mandatory for such officers as are appointed by the central government in corporations established by or under any central Act, government companies, societies and local authorities owned or controlled by the government.

In July, 2018, the central government brought an amendment to the PC Act by inserting Section 17A which once again extended protection to the central government employees from prosecution without sanction.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER] Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER]

without commenting on the merits of the case at this stage of investigation and the period of detention he faced in jail, the Court after analyzing all things allowed bail to the accused person ( Jai Ram). Himachal Pradesh High Court, Grant Bail, Justice Anup Chitrakara

How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.? How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.?

SHO Bhardwaj was quick to defend the Maulvi in questioning regarding the Mazar but harassed the reported who sought truth. Why did the SHO have to harass a Media reporter when he was doing his job? Who benefits from this? Why is there a Mazar on a flyover? Why is a Minority Welfare development Board in control of so much property? || #Mazar #SHOBhardwaj #Mazar #Mosque #WaqfBoard #Islam #News #Waqf #RemoveSHOBharadwaj

Does the Waqf board hold any relevance in the secular India of today? Does the Waqf board hold any relevance in the secular India of today?

Towards the end of the clip, Advocate Jain can be seen questioning the leaders of our land, the Central Government, and the parliament to look into the above and review such biased provisions for the greater good of all.  In the end, we are made to question if India is a secular country in the true sense of the term, after all! Wakf board land scam, Central Waqf Board, secular India article

TRENDING NEWS

call-for-chapters-gender-based-violence-and-religion
Trending Law School
Call For Chapters: Gender-Based Violence and Religion

Calling For Book Chapters: As an editor, Dr. Amit Anand, Assistant Professor, School of Legal Studies, REVA University, Bengaluru, is inviting people to contribute to a book, entitled "Gender-Based Violence and Religion." This book is scheduled to be published by Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

15 April, 2024 04:21 PM
sc-extends-stay-on-allahabad-hc-order-approving-survey-of-shahi-idgah-complex
Trending Judiciary
SC extends stay on Allahabad HC order approving survey of Shahi Idgah complex

SC extends stay on Allahabad HC's order for survey of Shahi Eidgah mosque next to Krishna Janmabhoomi.

15 April, 2024 05:19 PM

TOP STORIES

misleading-advts-case-baba-ramdev-balkrishna-tender-apology
Trending Business
Misleading advts case: Baba Ramdev, Balkrishna tender apology

Baba Ramdev, Balkrishna apologize for misleading ads. SC contempt plea hearing set for April 10. Patanjali assures compliance with court orders.

10 April, 2024 10:44 AM
sc-allows-gangster-turned-politicians-son-to-attend-fatiha
Trending Judiciary
SC allows gangster-turned-politician's son to attend 'Fatiha'

Supreme Court allows jailed MLA Abbas Ansari to attend his father's funeral prayers, granting temporary release under police custody.

10 April, 2024 11:11 AM
each-moveable-property-not-required-to-be-disclosed-by-candidates-in-election-sc
Trending Judiciary
Each moveable property not required to be disclosed by candidates in election: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules not every movable asset needs disclosure in elections. Privacy rights preserved. Details vary per case. High value assets matter.

10 April, 2024 12:02 PM
delhi-cm-arvind-kejriwal-moves-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal moves Supreme Court

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal moves Supreme Court against dismissal of plea in liquor policy scam case. Lawyers seek early hearing from CJI-led bench.

10 April, 2024 12:39 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email