38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, December 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Modifies Delhi HC order on Chandni Chowk Encroachment, Holds Municipal Corporation primarily responsible for the work

By Tanurag Ghosh      24 July, 2020 01:06 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court DelhiHC Chandni Chowk Encroachment

The Delhi High Court passed an order on the removal of encroachments from the carriageway at Chandni Chowk in New Delhi on 14th November 2019. In the order, the High Court had placed the responsibility of ensuring compliance with this act on the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, specifically on Additional Chief Secretary (Home).

This order was passed on a plea filed by the NGO Manushi Sangathan. In 2015 the court directed the Municipal Corporation to remove these encroachments by religious structures on the roads of Chandni Chowk. It asked the government of the region and the police to extend co-operation to the civic agency. This order was modified by the Supreme Court in 2018 that the responsibility of removal rested on the civic body and Delhi Government must extend support co-operation. 

The top bench, also comprising Justice KM Joseph, in its order said-

The direction contained in paragraph 20 of the impugned judgment and order of the High Court will have to be modified so as to be consistent with what is set out in the order of this Court dated 16 May 2018 by which it was clarified that while the primary responsibility is cast upon the Municipal Corporation, the GNCTD shall extend necessary cooperation. We clarify accordingly.

The Supreme Court has now modified this order. The bench comprising of Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra stated that the primary responsibility of clearing illegal occupants is on the Municipal corporation and the Government of Delhi should only assist it in this exercise.

The Apex court took into consideration Section 317(2) of the Delhi Corporation Act, 1957 for this modification. It noted that the aforementioned section casts an obligation on the Commissioner of the Municipal Corporation of the district to remove the encroachment.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM

TOP STORIES

scwla-hails-supreme-courts-historic-30-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils-a-landmark-leap-for-gender-parity-in-the-legal-profession
Trending Legal Insiders
SCWLA Hails Supreme Court’s Historic 30% Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils: A Landmark Leap for Gender Parity in the Legal Profession [Read Press Release]

Supreme Court orders 30% reservation for women in State Bar Councils; SCWLA welcomes the landmark verdict as a major step toward gender equality in the legal profession.

09 December, 2025 04:45 PM
only-central-state-employees-fall-under-section-2e-gratuity-exclusion-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Only Central, State Employees Fall Under Section 2(e) Gratuity Exclusion: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules KSBC retired abkari workers are entitled to gratuity, holding that Section 2(e) exclusion applies only to government employees.

09 December, 2025 08:28 PM
civic-bodies-have-authority-to-revise-property-tax-rates-courts-cannot-substitute-judgment-on-policy-decisions-sc
Trending Judiciary
Civic Bodies Have Authority to Revise Property Tax Rates; Courts Cannot Substitute Judgment on Policy Decisions: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds municipal autonomy to revise property tax rates, ruling that courts cannot interfere in policy decisions absent arbitrariness or illegality.

09 December, 2025 08:35 PM
hostile-witness-testimony-cannot-be-rejected-in-toto-supreme-court-reiterates-settled-legal-position
Trending Judiciary
Hostile Witness Testimony Cannot Be Rejected in Toto: Supreme Court Reiterates Settled Legal Position [Read Judgment]

Hostile witness testimony cannot be rejected entirely, the Supreme Court held, reaffirming that credible portions supporting prosecution or defence must still be considered.

09 December, 2025 08:44 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email