38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Grants Further Time to Centre on Challenges to 1991 Law, No Blanket Stay on Proceedings Related to Religious Places

By Jhanak Sharma      12 July, 2023 05:43 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Grants Further Time to Centre on Challenges to 1991 Law, No Blanket Stay on Proceedings Related to Religious Places

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that it can't issue a blanket stay on proceedings before different courts on religious places as it granted further time to the Union government to clarify its stand on pleas challenging validity of the Places of Worship Act, 1991, which mandated for maintaining status of religious places as prevailed on August 15, 1947.

The top court also said there is no stay on the law for maintaining status of religious places. However, it cannot order blanket stay on proceedings in various courts across the country related to religious places.

The court had issued notice on March 12, 2021 to the Centre on a plea filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.

On Tuesday, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted before a three-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, "I'm conscious of the fact that I have sought time for this before but it (Centre's response) is under consideration. Central government needs more time to file it".

After hearing Mehtas submissions, the top court said, "having regard to ramifications of the case, let counter affidavit be filed by Centre till October 31, 2023".

BJP leader Subramaniam Swamy, one of the petitioners, submitted that the Centre is taking adjournment after adjournment. He asked the court to keep the matter for final hearing. The court, however, said let us see the affidavit by the Centre first.

Advocate Vrinda Grover, appearing for a party to oppose the plea, contended the Centre may be granted more time to file its response, but the court should clarify that the 1991 Act should be effectively implemented as petitions across the country are being filed in courts with regard to several religious structures due to the pendency of matter here.

The bench, also comprising Justices P S Narasimha and Manoj Misra, then said there is no stay on the 1991 law.

"There is no stay on the Act. Mere pendency of proceedings doesn't mean there is a stay. We cannot stay proceedings before courts without knowing what those are," the bench said.

The court said it would proceed after filing of the counter affidavit by the Union government.

In his plea, Upadhyay claimed the 1991 Act takes away the rights of Hindus, Jains, Buddhist and Sikhs to restore their "places of worship and pilgrimages, destroyed by barbaric invaders.

"The Act had put a retrospective cut-off date of August 15, 1947 mandating maintaining the character of religious places and barring any court to take up any petition except the Ram Temple at Ayodhya," it said.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
NEXT POST ?
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email