38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Hearing on Dharam Sansad Case

By LawStreet News Network      12 May, 2022 01:52 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Hearing Dharam Sansad Case

Sr Adv Sidharth Luthra: Hes already spent almost 6 months theres medical condition

Justice Rastogi: What is the Dharam sansad btw?

Luthra- Im an Arya Samaji, Idk. Ive seen videos, People in Bhagwa kapdas got together and gave speeches

Justice Rastogi: were asking whats Dharam sansad

Luthra- theyre getting together and gave speeches& crowds gathered

Justice Rastogi: Spoiling the atmosphere! Stay together peacefully, enjoy the life

Luthra- i bow down. We need to be sensitive to people and nation and our citizens I understand

Bench- Before they ask to sensitise others theyve to sensitise themselves first. Theyre not sensitised. This is something spoiling the whole atmosphere

Luthra- this is the 7th FIR

Bench to complainant counsel- whats the maximum sentence?

Counsel- 5 years 
Luthra- 3

Bench- its 3

Counsel- if religious place its 5 years

Bench- dharam sansad isnt religious place. 3 yrs is maximum, chargesheet is filed, what do you want?

Counsel- theyre sending a message that we arent afraid of law.

Bench- maximum is 3, hes been in jail since January. For 4 months hes already been in custody. What further investigation you want from him? Its already complete

Counsel- our concern is, theres an exception to 41 A also. He is hell bent on not following the law. He made another video on 28th.

Bench- any standing counsel for Uttarakhand?

Deputy AG is present in the court

BENCH- take notice well take it next week. File the counter. We are not concerned about what happened, weve to take the totality of matter, punishment, period of custody, etc. what further do you want. Tell us that

Bench- Issue notice. Copy be served to State counsel and counsel for complainant present in court.

List on Tuesday

SC: Notice issued. To be heard on May 17



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-dismisses-pil-challenging-ecis-mass-transfer-of-officers-in-west-bengal
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses PIL Challenging ECI’s Mass Transfer of Officers in West Bengal [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging ECI’s mass transfer of officers in West Bengal, upholding its powers under Article 324.

31 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM
sc-dismisses-challenge-to-mha-circular-on-vande-mataram-terms-apprehensions-premature
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Challenge to MHA Circular on ‘Vande Mataram’; Terms Apprehensions Premature

Supreme Court dismisses plea against MHA’s ‘Vande Mataram’ circular, calls concerns premature as directive is advisory with no mandatory or penal effect.

26 March, 2026 04:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email