38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Issues Notice on Plea Against Pre-Election Freebies in Rajasthan and MP

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      07 October, 2023 03:48 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Issues Notice on Plea Against Pre Election Freebies in Rajasthan and MP

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Friday issued notice on a plea challenging cash benefit offers being made by the political parties as "freebies" in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh just ahead of Assembly elections.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said that before elections, all kinds of promises are made, which is difficult to be controlled.

The petitioners counsel contended that it is not just a promise rather its net worth is negative, and they mortgaged the forest land.

The bench told the counsel that the petitioner should have gone to the concerned high court.

Why do you come here? The high court is not available," the bench asked.

The counsel then said there are two states, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan involved in the matter here.

He also submitted a line has to be drawn between what is public interest and what is not. The counsel further contended that nothing is more atrocious than allowing the government to distribute cash. A few months before elections these things have started and the tax paying citizen has to bear the burden, he said.

"Before elections all kinds of promises are made, we cannot control this," the bench said.

However, upon hearing submissions, the bench said it would tag with the instant plea with a similar PIL filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, which sought a direction to outlaw freebies announced for voters by political parties.

The top court asked the petitioners counsel to implead Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan and delete the chief minister's office, and instead make the state of Rajasthan a party in the matter.

The top court issued notice to the Centre, Election Commission of India, states of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh.

The court sought a response within four weeks on the petition filed by one Bhattulal Jain.

The petitioner sought a direction  not to misuse consolidated fund or grant on the name of the public purposes, under Article 266(3), 282 of the Constitution, at the verge of election.

His plea also sought a declaration that the promise of distribution of irrational freebies from the public fund before election to lure voters is analogous to the bribery and undue influence under Section 171-B and Section 171-C of the IPC.

It also pleaded for framing the comprehensive guidelines on such announcements before the elections.

"No government can declare free electricity, free water, free distribution or loan waiver without the approval of legislative assembly, irrespective of which government is ruling. Since the money belongs to our taxpayers, the taxpayers should have the right to monitor its use. Political parties keep on wooing the public by offering freebies for votes. Whatever projects are announced, the government should first submit their blueprint and get approval from legislative assembly," the plea said.

"This should also apply to the salaries of MPs and MLAs and other non-legislative benefits received by them. Is democracy limited only to charity? What rights do public have as tax payers after that? Taxpayers should have the right to hold MPs, MLAS accountable and initiate disciplinary action against them for obstructing the work of legislative assembly," it added.

Notably on August 26, 2022, the top court had decided to examine the PIL by Upadhyay.

"Freebies may create a situation wherein the State Government cannot provide basic amenities due to lack of funds and the State is pushed towards imminent bankruptcy. In the same breath, we should remember that such freebies are extended utilizing tax payers money only for increasing the popularity of the party and electoral prospects," the bench had said.
 



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

father-of-deceased-pilot-in-ahmedabad-crash-moves-sc-for-court-monitored-probe
Trending Judiciary
Father of deceased pilot in Ahmedabad crash moves SC for court monitored probe

91-year-old father of pilot killed in Ahmedabad Air India crash moves SC seeking court-monitored probe into alleged biased and flawed investigation.

17 October, 2025 10:54 AM
child-cant-consent-to-sex-life-imprisonment-upheld-for-sexual-assault-on-minor-girl-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Can’t Consent to Sex — Life Imprisonment Upheld for Sexual Assault on Minor Girl: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC upholds life imprisonment for assault on minor SC girl, reiterating that a child cannot consent to sex; school records key for age proof.

17 October, 2025 11:45 AM
sc-criticizes-casual-declaration-of-witnesses-as-hostile-upholds-conviction-under-sc-st-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticizes Casual Declaration of Witnesses as Hostile, Upholds Conviction under SC/ST Act [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court slams casual practice of declaring witnesses hostile; upholds life imprisonment in SC/ST Act case involving rape of minor girl.

17 October, 2025 11:55 AM
delhi-hc-quashes-22-year-old-complaint-against-advocate-reiterates-that-a-lawyers-office-is-not-a-commercial-activity
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year Old Complaint Against Advocate, Reiterates That A Lawyer’s Office Is Not A Commercial Activity [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC quashes 22-year-old complaint against advocate, rules that a lawyer’s office is not a commercial activity under MDP 2001 and Building Bye-Laws.

17 October, 2025 01:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email