38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 28, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court hearing matter of pending local body polls in Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh

By LawStreet News Network      10 May, 2022 11:06 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court local body polls Maharashtra

J Khanwilkar: We'll be tagging both matters for further hearing. Reads from operative part of order

Order: Quietus permitted only when bodies dissolved before end of tenure. Here many bodies pending polls. 
Thus all are obliged to have newly elected members in all bodies before 5 year ends, incumbents cannot continue beyond six months beyond tenure. This is inviolable.

Order: Reality in State of MP is more than 20k are functioning beyond tenure, this cannot be countenanced. 
SEC Exercise for further delimitation at this stage cannot be made legitimate ground to set forth polls duties.

Order: Need to not disrupt governance, cannot go against fire the people by the people of the people. 
Direct by way of interim order, to issue polls as per exisiting wards or become coming into force of impugned notification in respect of concerned local bodies, no need to wait

Order: for triple test compliance. People must be governed by newly elected representatives, no provision for OBC as of now need notification.

Order: Pro OBC parties are free to nominate OBC candidates for general category seats. Process of delimitation and triple test compliance is complex, time consuming but conduct of new polls is explicitly provided for. Former need not detain pending polls.

Order: After exercises completed, future polls can be conducted as such. Notify polls well in time then, else would defeat Constitutional mandate and go against local body governance. Such exercises shouldn't stall due polls, else would create hiatus.

Order: Direct MP to proceed on notional basis and go by wards as in date when polls were due to be called. Do so in 2 weeks, State to extend logistical assistance
Backward class comm report, we won't intend to examine it comment on it, that by itself is not triple test compliance

Order: Exercise of collation of emotional data after which recomendations for delimitation to be made. State can only act thereafter.


Order: SEC need not wait any further, but notify polls without any further delay. 23k + local bodies due for polls. 
Overlooking the same would be violation of our earlier orders, reservation can be limited to Constitutional provisions for now.

Order: We make it clear and direct SEC must implement this interim order uninfluenced by any other fora, their orders superceded. 
As requested by SG Tushar Mehta, we place on record all steps will be subject to outcome of proceedings.

Supreme Court orders local body polls in Madhya Pradesh, due for over two years, without OBC reservation. State election commission has been directed to notify polls within 2 weeks. More than 23,000 local body seats are currently vacant in MP.

SC directs Madhya Pradesh state election commission to start process for holding election to 23,400 local bodies and issue notification within two weeks. It makes it clear that OBC reservation be not provided as triple test formalities have not been completed by the state.

SC rules government and election commission cant defer polls for local bodies to complete de limitation process and to fulfill the triple test criteria for OBC reservation. It says its is constitutional obligation of all authorities to hold polls before expiry of five year tenure



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

section-377-ipc-not-applicable-to-consensual-sexual-acts-between-husband-and-wife-during-marriage-mp-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Section 377 IPC Not Applicable to Consensual Sexual Acts Between Husband and Wife During Marriage: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court holds Section 377 IPC not applicable to sexual acts between husband and wife, partly quashing FIR in dowry and abuse case.

27 March, 2026 03:44 PM
mention-of-quantity-type-in-arrest-notice-sufficient-under-bnss-exact-quantity-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Mention of Quantity Type in Arrest Notice Sufficient Under BNSS, Exact Quantity Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala HC rules that mentioning nature of contraband quantity in arrest notice is sufficient under BNSS; exact quantity need not be specified.

27 March, 2026 04:07 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email