38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 21, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court notifies revised roaster, to come into effect from July 2

By LawStreet News Network      25 June, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments

With the change in the Supreme Courts dynamics on the retirement of Justice J. Chelameshwar on June 22, 2018, the new roaster has been notified pursuant to the order passed by Chief Justice of India, Dipak Misra.

The new roaster that will come into effect on July 2, 2018, lays down the subject category of cases that will be allotted to the Supreme Court judges, including the Chief Justice of India.

CJI Misra will take up the matters related to PILs and letter petitions, social justice, election, arbitration, Habeas Corpus and Contempt of Court, etc.

Justice Ranjan Gogoi, who has now become the second most senior Judge of the Supreme Court will inter alia, deal with cases relating to labour laws, indirect taxation and personal laws among other things.

The matters pertaining to environment, land acquisition, social justice, and personal laws are assigned to Justice Madan Lokur. Justice Kurian Joseph will be assigned inter alia, cases related to rent acts, labour laws, and service matters.

Justice A K Sikri the new member in the Supreme Court Collegium will take up taxation matters, elections and criminal matters along with contempt cases and personal law cases.

The previous roaster was notified on February 1, 2018, when the four most senior judges of the Supreme Court Justice Chalameswar, Justice Gogoi, Justice Lokur and Justice Joseph had held a press conference asserting that the administration of the Apex Court is not in order.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

homoeopathy-practitioner-cannot-prescribe-allopathy-medicines-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Homoeopathy Practitioner Cannot Prescribe Allopathy Medicines: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Supreme Court holds homoeopathy practitioners cannot prescribe allopathy drugs; Telangana HC quashes FIR on procedural lapse under NMCA.

20 February, 2026 11:28 AM
contractual-bar-on-interest-claims-overrides-interest-act-kerala-high-court-order-set-aside-sc
Trending Judiciary
Contractual Bar on Interest Claims Overrides Interest Act; Kerala High Court Order Set Aside: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that contractual clauses barring interest claims override the Interest Act, setting aside Kerala High Court’s order on delayed payments.

20 February, 2026 11:43 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email