38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, May 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court to continue hearing plea seeking implementation of "One Rank One Pension" in Defense Forces.

By LawStreet News Network      16 February, 2022 11:39 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court One Rank One Pension Defense Forces

Plea avers that despite assurance on floor of Parliament, what is being implemented is "diff pensions for same rank depending on when the person retired

ASG Venkataraman to continue with his submissions

ASG: Please take the comprehensive affidavit we had filed. They have raised 3 contentions- we'll deal with all 3: 
It should be automatic & not periodical 
Review once in 5 years is not acceptable

ASG: 3rd is one chart which im going to show & you should take the highest of the scale & not go by mean.

DYC J: You've taken the mean but nobody is brought down.

ASG: Yes none is brought down.

ASG: Please see tabular chart 1 prepared by my friend.

ASG refers the chart wherein comparison has been made b/w the pension of sepoys who retired after 2015 & before 2015.

ASG: You can't compare oranges & apples & make distinction.

Nath J: Suppose somebody retired in 1990 & the ACP came in 2006, the rank will still remain but he will get the diff pay scale. Because your is twin condition: same rank & same service.

ASG: Yes but don't bring MACP into it. My friends are comparing MACP with non MACP.

DYC J: Acc to them is that you're giving MACP retrospectively from 2006.

DYC J: Acc to you the perfect mathematical equality cannot be achieved?

ASG: Yes the same cannot be achieved.

ASG: 2nd eg is b/w Naik & Hawaldar.

ASG: The 3rd eg which is at page 80- someone who is not qualified is being compared.

ASG: 3rd comparison is not being comparable at all.

Nath J: Your OROP will not be applicable to soldiers retiring after 2014?

ASG: Its upto a grade. It goes on.... Let me take instructions.

DYC J: Just take this case of group captain.

Nath J: Notification says the it applies to employees retiring 1.7.2014.

ASG: Please take my friend's reply on this 3. Whatever we have put on record has not been denied. Please look at para 17.

ASG: OROP is applicable for personnel retiring upto 30.6.2014. That's what the instructions i've received.

ASG: They want MACP to be badged with non MACP & get the same scale. 
Within the same rank the pay scale because of MACP may vary but he retains the same designation.

ASG: Our court has said that people may draw diff salaries but having the same rank because of MACP. Now my friend says match me with Naik for OROP. Non MACP Sepoy & MACP sepoy & asking them to match with MACP is claiming to get higher.

ASG: To say for pension you'll be diff & for OROP will be diff is not right...

Nath J: But after 2006 he would not be retiring not at the same scale pay but a diff scale pay..

ASG: If someone who has qualified for MACP in their regular service.

Kant J: Under MACP what is the approx percentage who have been granted the benefit. MACP is based on length of service. If you have factor of 9 years, 24 years- there will be hardly any person who will serve for 24 years.

ASG: Someone qualifying for MACP & not for MACP is not the subject matter of this writ.

Kant J: Its not within the subject matter but its imp for OROP. if in the cadre of Sepoy 80% of them will get MACP then they will get same OROP. What it appears is that MACP has become barrier for grant of OROP.

DYC J: There also larger number of people will get same MACP because of 8 years.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

madras-hc-shields-ayushmann-khurrana-and-sara-ali-khan-starrer-pati-patni-aur-woh-do-from-piracy-grants-ad-interim-injunction-against-isps-and-cable-tv-operators-ahead-of-release
Trending CelebStreet
Madras HC Shields Ayushmann Khurrana and Sara Ali Khan Starrer “Pati Patni Aur Woh Do” from Piracy; Grants Ad Interim Injunction Against ISPs and Cable TV Operators Ahead of Release [Read Order]

Madras High Court grants anti-piracy injunction for Pati Patni Aur Woh Do, restraining ISPs and cable operators ahead of its May 15, 2026 release.

02 May, 2026 02:35 PM
bombay-hc-quashes-fir-against-shekhar-suman-and-bharti-singh-over-ya-allah-rasgulla-dahi-bhalla
Trending CelebStreet
Bombay HC Quashes FIR Against Shekhar Suman and Bharti Singh Over “Ya Allah! Rasgulla! Dahi Bhalla!” [Read Order]

Bombay High Court quashes 2010 FIR against Shekhar Suman and Bharti Singh, holding “Rasgulla” and “Dahi Bhalla” are neutral, not religiously offensive.

02 May, 2026 03:51 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-brutal-stabbing-of-woman-advocate-missing-children-hospital-refusal-under-scanner
Trending Judiciary
SC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Brutal Stabbing of Woman Advocate; Missing Children, Hospital Refusal Under Scanner

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of Delhi lawyer stabbing case, orders probe into hospital denial and directs police to trace two missing children.

27 April, 2026 04:56 PM
west-bengal-elections-calcutta-hc-expands-motorcycle-restrictions-bars-group-riding
Trending Judiciary
West Bengal Elections Calcutta HC Expands Motorcycle Restrictions, Bars Group Riding [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court bars group motorcycle riding from two days before West Bengal polling, modifying Single Judge order on CEO’s appeal.

28 April, 2026 05:10 PM
mere-absence-of-results-in-hair-treatment-cannot-prove-medical-negligence-or-deficiency-in-service-ncdrc-sets-aside-orders-against-dermatologist-plastic-surgeon-and-lifecell-international
Trending Judiciary
Mere Absence of Results in Hair Treatment Cannot Prove Medical Negligence or Deficiency in Service: NCDRC Sets Aside Orders Against Dermatologist, Plastic Surgeon, and Lifecell International [Read Order]

NCDRC rules that failure of PRP hair treatment alone does not prove negligence, sets aside compensation orders against doctors and Lifecell International.

28 April, 2026 05:51 PM
sc-upholds-translocation-of-deer-from-hauz-khas-deer-park-to-rajasthan-tiger-reserves-directs-moefcc-to-grant-statutory-status-to-cec-wildlife-translocation-guidelines
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Translocation of Deer from Hauz Khas Deer Park to Rajasthan Tiger Reserves; Directs MoEFCC to Grant Statutory Status to CEC Wildlife Translocation Guidelines [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds deer translocation from Hauz Khas to Rajasthan reserves; directs MoEFCC to grant statutory status to CEC guidelines.

28 April, 2026 05:57 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email