38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Supreme Court Orders 10-Day Status Quo on Railway Demolition Drive near Krishna Janambhoomi in Mathura

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      16 August, 2023 09:12 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Orders 10-Day Status Quo on Railway Demolition Drive near Krishna Janambhoomi in Mathura

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Wednesday directed the Railway authorities to maintain status quo for 10 days on demolition drive being carried out by them to remove encroachments near Krishna Janambhoomi in Mathura, Uttar Pradesh.

"Let there be status quo as regards the subject premises for a period of 10 days. List after a week, a bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose, Sanjay Kumar and S V N Bhatti said, after hearing a counsel for petitioner Yakub Shah and others.

The court also issued notice to Centre and railways in the matter.

Appearing for Shah, senior advocate P C Sen submitted that this is a demolition matter near Krishna Janmabhoomi and many have been houses have already been bulldozed.

He sought urgent intervention of the court, alleging that the authorities conducted the exercise on a day when UP courts were closed.

The plea claimed the demolition drive by railway authorities to clear encroachments near Krishna Janmabhoomi in Mathura, would adversely affect about 3000 people who have been living at those places since the 1800s.

The railways decided to clear encroachments behind the temple complex, primarily consisting of residential structures, as part of the efforts to convert an existing metre gauge railway track to a broad-gauge track, to facilitate a connection between Mathura and Vrindavan.  

Shah and others claimed the action of demolition during the pendency of an appeal against the before Mathura Civil court is absolutely illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email